Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,194,787
Growing community

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), New Delhi vs M/s Sarb Consulate Marine Products Pvt. Ltd.: Validity of Block Assessment Limitation Period Under Section 158BE vs Artificial Extension of Search and Seizure Operations Through Dummy Panchnama Under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
17/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 162
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Search Action: The Respondent-Assessee, an entity engaged in fishing activities on the high seas, was subjected to a search and seizure operation under Section 132 of the Income ...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-VIII, New Delhi vs. Sawhney Exports (2007) | Allowance of Bad Debts Under Section 36(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961: Whether Prior or Post-Facto Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Approval is Mandatory for Writing Off Foreign Exchange Bad Debts in the Books of Accounts

Author
My Tax Expert
17/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 123
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Assessee (Sawhney Exports) is an export house engaged in the business of exporting garments and receiving payments in foreign exchange. For the Assessment Year (AY) 1997-98, th...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Divine Leasing & Finance Ltd., General Exports & Credits Ltd. & Lovely Exports (P) Ltd. – Section 68 Share Capital Addition, Burden of Proof and Unexplained Cash Credits (Delhi High Court)

Author
My Tax Expert
17/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 144
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed a batch of appeals challenging concurrent findings of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), both of which had deleted additio...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-VIII v. Shri Prem Nath Nagpal: Legality of Block Assessment Additions Under Section 158BC Based Solely on DVO Reference in the Absence of Seized Incriminating Material and the Interpretation of Undisclosed Income Under Chapter XIV-B of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
17/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 157
Read More »
Facts of the Case Search Operations: A search and seizure operation under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, was conducted at the residential premises of the Assessee on December 17, 1999. Re...

Commissioner of Income Tax-V vs. M/s Oracle Software India Ltd. (ITA No. 1531/2006) – Interpretation of 'Manufacture' under Section 80IA of the Income Tax Act, 1961: Delhi High Court Judgment

Author
My Tax Expert
17/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 130
Read More »
Facts of the Case Parties: The Appellant is The Commissioner of Income Tax-V, New Delhi, and the Respondent is M/s Oracle Software India Ltd.. Assessment Year: The dispute pertains to the Assessmen...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs P.H.I. Seeds India Ltd. (2006) – Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) Cannot Be Levied for Bona Fide Claim Based on Debatable Interpretation of Law

Author
My Tax Expert
17/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 125
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, P.H.I. Seeds India Ltd., was engaged in agricultural activities and earned interest income from Fixed Deposit Receipts (FDRs) amounting to Rs. 12,07,217, which was assessable under the he...

The Commissioner of Income Tax-V vs. M/s Oracle Software India Ltd. (2007) | ITA No. 785 of 2006 (Consolidated with ITA No. 641 of 2006) – Delhi High Court Judgement on Section 80IA Manufacture Qualification for Software Duplication and Section 40(a)(i) Deferral Allowability upon TDS Payment

Author
My Tax Expert
17/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 141
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Assessee, M/s Oracle Software India Ltd., is a 100% subsidiary of Oracle Corporation, USA. It is engaged in developing, designing, marketing, and importing computer software. ...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-XVII vs Prasar Bharti (Broadcasting Corporation of India) – TDS on Television Programme Production Payments: Section 194C vs Section 194J | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
17/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 164
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe respondent, Prasar Bharti (Broadcasting Corporation of India), made payments to producers engaged for producing television programmes under the “commissioned category.” While making such paym...

Commissioner of Income Tax-V vs. M/s Oracle Software India Ltd. (2007) | Interpretation of Section 40(a)(i) Royalty Expenses with Pre-Year Tax Deductions at Source (TDS) and Duplication of Software Master Copies as Eligible Manufacturing Activity under Section 80-IA of the Income Tax Act, 1961: A Comprehensive Case Brief on Corporate Deductions and Fiscal Compliance Precedents

Author
My Tax Expert
17/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 129
Read More »
Facts of the Case Corporate Structure: The Respondent/Assessee (M/s Oracle Software India Ltd.) is a 100% wholly-owned subsidiary of Oracle Corporation, USA. It was incorporated to develop, produce, m...

The Commissioner of Income Tax-V vs. M/s Oracle Software India Ltd.: High Court of Delhi on Section 40(a)(i) Tax Deduction at Source (TDS) Compliance Timelines and Section 80IA Deductions for Software Duplication as a Manufacturing Activity

Author
My Tax Expert
17/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 123
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Respondent/Assessee (M/s Oracle Software India Ltd.) is a 100% subsidiary of Oracle Corporation, USA, engaged in developing, designing, producing, marketing, distributing, and im...