Cash Payment to Government Utility Covered by Rule 6DD and Reimbursement of Partner’s Interest Not Hit by Section 40(a)(ia): Pramukh Metal Quarry vs. ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)

Author
My Tax Expert
22/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 496
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Pramukh Metal Quarry, filed an appeal against the order dated 31.01.2024 passed by the Addl./JCIT(A), Visakhapatnam for Assessment Year 2008-09, arising out of reassessment proceedings un...

Ex Parte Appellate Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice in Section 69A Cash Deposit Case: Kuvar Giri Hiragiri Gosai vs. ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)

Author
My Tax Expert
22/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 453
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Kuvar Giri Hiragiri Gosai, did not file a return of income for Assessment Year 2012-13. The Assessing Officer observed cash deposits aggregating to ₹20,00,000 in the assessee’s bank a...

Addition under Section 69A Deleted Where Cash Deposits Explained by Agricultural Income and Bank Loan: Kanubhai Maganbhai Patel vs. ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)

Author
My Tax Expert
22/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 680
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Kanubhai Maganbhai Patel, an agriculturist residing in a remote village in Anand district, was subjected to reassessment for Assessment Year 2012-13 on the basis of information regarding ...

Disallowance under Section 40A(2)(b) Restored Where Excessive Director Remuneration Was Used as Dividend Substitution: DCIT vs. Khyati Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Ahmedabad)

Author
My Tax Expert
22/01/2026  |  1 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 898
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Khyati Chemicals Private Limited, engaged in the manufacture of chemicals, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2018-19 declaring total income of ₹17,84,76,810. The assessment...

Ex Parte Appellate Order Set Aside and Matter Remanded Where Agricultural Land Capital Gain and Service of Notice Were Disputed: Mahipatsinh Ramseenh Solankee vs. ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)

Author
My Tax Expert
22/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 464
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Mahipatsinh Ramseenh Solankee, filed an appeal for Assessment Year 2020-21 against the order dated 18.03.2025 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal ...

Additions under Section 69C Based on Seized Diaries Sustained; Interest Treated as Real Income for AY 2020-21; Assessee Appeals Dismissed: Mukesh Mohanlal Vaghela vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)

Author
My Tax Expert
22/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 364
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Mukesh Mohanlal Vaghela, an individual based in Mumbai, filed returns of income for Assessment Years 2013-14 to 2020-21. A search and seizure action under Section 132 was conducted on 23....

Section 50C Valuation Dispute Remanded for DVO Reference Where Stamp Duty Value Alleged to Exceed Fair Market Value: Laljibhai Parshottambhai Gaudani vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)

Author
My Tax Expert
22/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 421
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Laljibhai Parshottambhai Gaudani, filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2012-13 declaring income of ₹22,44,370. The assessment was reopened under Section 147 on the basis of in...

Penalty under Section 272A(1)(d) Deleted Where Non-Compliance Was Due to Reasonable Cause under Section 273B: Chudaji Thakor vs. ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)

Author
My Tax Expert
22/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 3251
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Chudaji Thakor, an individual farmer residing in a remote village in Gandhinagar district, had not filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2018-19. During the relevant year, the as...

Closing Stock Valuation Issue Remanded for Fresh Verification Where Quantity Not in Dispute and Valuation Reconciliation Ignored: Jitubhai Shamaldas Tokle vs. ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)

Author
My Tax Expert
22/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 456
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Jitubhai Shamaldas Tokle, proprietor of Tokle Timbers, filed an appeal for Assessment Year 2022-23 against the order dated 17.10.2025 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), N...

Section 68 Addition Deleted Where Loan Amounts Were Fully Repaid Before Filing of Return and Completion of Assessment: Shaurya Developers vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)

Author
My Tax Expert
22/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 630
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Shaurya Developers, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2017-18 on 31.10.2017 declaring total income of ₹35,95,670. The assessment proceedings were initiated and notice under...