Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,202,270
Growing community

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Business Loss Cannot Be Disallowed on Suspicion or AO’s View of Commercial Expediency; Genuine Loss on Sale of Tools and Dies Allowable: PCIT-4 vs. G-Tekt India Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
03/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 451
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act challenging the order dated 19.07.2023 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for Assessment Year 2014-15. The assessee, M/s G...

Transfer Pricing Comparables Must Be Functionally Similar Even Under TNMM; High-End Engineering and Infrastructure Companies Cannot Be Compared with Captive Service Providers: PCIT-3 vs. Fluor Daniel India Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
03/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 762
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act challenging the order dated 17.01.2019 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for Assessment Year 2011-12. The assessee, Fluor...

Prosecution Under Black Money Act Independent of Assessment Proceedings; Fabrication and Backdating of Documents Constitutes Wilful Attempt to Evade Tax: Sanjay Bhandari vs. Income Tax Office (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
03/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 456
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Sanjay Bhandari, filed a petition seeking quashing of Criminal Complaint No. 2121/2019 pending before the Court of the learned ACMM, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, along with the summoning ...

Makeshift Structures on Agricultural Land Do Not Qualify as “Construction of a Residential House” for Section 54 Exemption; Pure Question of Fact: Sandeep Hooda vs. DCIT (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
03/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 501
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Sandeep Hooda, filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2015-16 declaring total income of ₹1,27,54,600. He sold a residential property at 1/7, Shanti Niketan, New Delhi on 25.09....

Under Vivad Se Vishwas Act, Assessee May Settle nly Its Own Appeal and Not Departmental Appeal for Same Assessment Year; Unit of Settlement Is an Appeal: Rose Wood Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. vs. PCIT-7 (Delhi HC)O

Author
My Tax Expert
03/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 429
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Rose Wood Buildwell Private Limited, filed a writ petition challenging a certificate dated 23.04.2021 issued under Section 5(1) of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, whereby t...

Section 148A Order Set Aside for Non-Application of Mind and Erroneous Computation of Escapement; Matter Remanded for Fresh Consideration: Rishi Bansal vs. ITO (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
03/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 497
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Rishi Bansal, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 31.08.2024 passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income-tax Act and the consequential notice dated 31.08.2024 issued under ...

Loss on Sale of HTM Securities Cannot Be Disallowed Without Examining Supporting Material; Matter Remanded for Fresh Consideration under Section 45(2): Punjab National Bank vs. PCIT Delhi-V (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
03/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 519
Read More »
Facts of the CasePunjab National Bank filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act challenging the order dated 16.03.2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for Assessment Year 2006-07. The disput...

Application under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme Cannot Be Rejected Merely on Ground That Appeal May Be Non-Maintainable; Pendency of Appeal Constitutes Dispute: Prayas Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. vs. PCIT-7 (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
03/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 469
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Prayas Buildwell Private Limited, filed a writ petition challenging a communication dated 18.12.2020 whereby its declaration filed in Form 1 under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, ...

Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) Unsustainable for Vague Notice Not Specifying Exact Charge; Defective Penalty Notice Vitiates Proceedings: PCIT-7 vs. Sara SAE Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
03/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 511
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act challenging the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal deleting penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) for Assessment Ye...

Transfer Pricing Comparability Is a Factual Determination; Exclusion of KPO and High-End BPO Companies Upheld and No Substantial Question of Law Arises: PCIT-4 vs. Symphony Marketing Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
03/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 496
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act against the order dated 18.08.2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in IT (TP) A No. 111/Bang/2014 for Assessment Year 2...