Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,191,669
Growing community

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Excess Cash Deposits Held Unexplained; No Substantial Question of Law under Section 260A – Kross Diamonds Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO Ward 14(3) (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 431
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Kross Diamonds Pvt. Ltd., filed appeals under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act challenging a common order dated 18.12.2024 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal had ...

Concurrent Jurisdiction of Jurisdictional AO and Faceless AO Reaffirmed; Reassessment Notices Upheld Despite Section 151A Challenge – Inder Dev Gupta vs. ACIT (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 543
Read More »
Facts of the CaseA batch of writ petitions was filed by Inder Dev Gupta and connected petitioners challenging notices issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer of Central Ci...

Writ Petition challenging the retention of seized assets and seeking release of jewellery, cash and bullion seized during search proceedings KOSHALIYA DEVI RASTOGI Versus ASSISTANT/ DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-27, NEW DELHI AND ANR

Author
My Tax Expert
27/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 565
Read More »
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision : 06.01.2026W.P.(C) 7448/2025 CM APPL. 41160/2025 KOSHALIYA DEVI RASTOGI ............................................PetitionerThrough: Mr. Sachit Jolly, Sr. Adv....

Reassessment Quashed as Time-Barred Where Notice Dispatched After Limitation Despite ITBA Generation Before Cut-Off – Grid Solutions SAS vs. ACIT (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 584
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Grid Solutions SAS, filed a writ petition challenging the notice dated 30.03.2025 issued under Section 148A(1) of the Income-tax Act for Assessment Year 2019–20, the order dated 30.06...

Receipts from Off-the-Shelf Software, Bandwidth and IT Support Services Not Taxable as Royalty or FTS under India–Singapore DTAA; Revenue Appeals Dismissed – CIT (International Taxation) vs. DXC Technology Services Singapore (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 439
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed appeals under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act challenging a common order dated 10.10.2023 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in respect of Assessment Years 2011-12 to 2014...

Reassessment for AY 2015–16 Quashed as Time-Barred; TOLA Inapplicable Post Rajeev Bansal – Anju Khosla vs. ITO Ward 15(1) (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 463
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Anju Khosla, challenged a notice dated 26.08.2024 issued under Section 148A(b) of the Income-tax Act for Assessment Year 2015–16, the order dated 31.08.2024 passed under Section 148A(...

Reassessment Upheld Where No Change of Reasons and Section 148A Procedure Properly Followed Post-2022 Amendment – Amandeep Singh (Guru Kripa Enterprises) vs. ACIT (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 451
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Amandeep Singh, proprietor of Guru Kripa Enterprises, filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2021–22 on 14.03.2022 declaring income of ₹8,53,950. On 29.03.2025, the Revenue ...

Jurisdiction of Jurisdictional Assessing Officer Upheld Despite Faceless Scheme; Reassessment Notices Sustained in Delhi – All India Kataria Educational Society vs. ACIT (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 463
Read More »
Facts of the CaseA batch of writ petitions, including those filed by All India Kataria Educational Society and connected assessees, were filed before the Delhi High Court challenging notices issued under Section 148 of...

Invalid Remand by CIT(A) Set Aside Where Jurisdictional Defect under Section 143(2) Not Adjudicated; Matter Restored to CIT(A) – Akasaki Technology (P) Ltd. vs. PCIT (Delhi HC)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 671
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Akasaki Technology (P) Ltd., filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2012–13 on 28.09.2012 declaring total income of ₹48,51,840. The assessment was reopened under Section 147 o...

Delay of 184 Days Condoned and Appeal Restored for Adjudication on Merits: Urmila RCP Projects Private Limited vs. ITO (TDS), Ranchi (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
24/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 469
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Urmila RCP Projects Private Limited, Ranchi, filed an appeal against the order dated 10.01.2025 passed by the Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Delhi for Assessmen...