Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Director of Income Tax vs. Angreji Hatao Nidhi (2007) 841-DB Delhi High Court | Corpus Donation vs Voluntary Contribution under Sections 11 & 12 of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
16/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 41
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe respondent, Angreji Hatao Nidhi, was a charitable society engaged in the promotion of the Hindi language. The society received a donation of ₹10 lakh from the Government of Uttar Pradesh along w...

Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) v. General Engineering Works | Penalty under Section 272A(2)(g) Cannot Be Levied Where Assessee Proves Reasonable Cause under Section 273B – Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
16/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 41
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, General Engineering Works, had filed its TDS returns. During scrutiny, the Income Tax Officer observed that the assessee had failed to issue TDS certificates within the prescribed statuto...

Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) v. General Engineering Works | Penalty under Section 272A(2)(g) for Delay in Issuing TDS Certificates – Reasonable Cause under Section 273B – Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
16/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 40
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee had filed its TDS returns; however, during scrutiny, the Income Tax Department noticed that the TDS certificates had not been issued within the prescribed statutory period.Consequently, t...

Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) vs. Global Infosystems Limited (Delhi High Court) – Penalty under Section 221 for Delayed Deposit of TDS Cannot Be Imposed Mechanically; Quantum of Penalty Must Be Exercised Judicially

Author
My Tax Expert
16/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 31
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee, Global Infosystems Limited, had delayed the deposit of TDS deducted during the relevant financial years 2001-02 and 2002-03. Proceedings were initiated by the Income Tax Departm...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Hitech Flexotext Pvt. Ltd. – Appeal Maintainability under Section 260A and Validity of Notice under Section 143(2) of the Income-tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
16/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 32
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee filed its return of income on 13 November 1990. The Assessing Officer issued a notice under Section 143(2) on 18 February 1991. The notice was received by the assessee on 19 Fe...

M/s Indag Rubber Limited vs Commissioner of Income Tax, New Delhi | Deductibility of Arbitration Award Liability under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
16/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 30
Read More »
Facts of the Case M/s Indag Rubber Limited entered into an agreement dated 24 July 1991 with the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (RSRTC) for the supply of a cold process retreading plant and retr...

Commissioner of Income Tax XVI vs. Marubeni India Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court) – TDS on Salary, Expatriate Employees, Performance Incentive and Interest under Section 201(1A) of the Income-tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
16/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 32
Read More »
Facts of the CaseMarubeni India Pvt. Ltd., a company employing expatriate personnel in India, deducted tax at source on salaries paid to its employees and deposited the same in accordance with law. Certain expatriate ...

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Tyagi Group (2008): Valuation of Unquoted Equity Shares under Section 2(22B)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1981 – Applicability of the Principle of Consistency and DVO Fair Market Value Determinations in Co-Owner Assessments

Author
My Tax Expert
16/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 32
Read More »
Facts of the Case The case involves six conjoined appeals arising from a common order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) on September 17, 2001, concerning assessees belonging to the Ty...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Late Shri A.R. Chadha (Through Legal Heir Shri C.M. Chadha) – Satisfaction for Initiation of Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) Must Be Evident from Assessment Order

Author
My Tax Expert
16/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 33
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed appeals challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which had held that penalty proceedings initiated against the assessee under Section 271(1)(c) were invalid. The as...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Tyagi Group (ITA No. 685/2008) – Valuation of Unquoted Equity Shares under Section 2(22B)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961: Delhi High Court Upholds Principle of Consistency in Determining Fair Market Value Based on Co-Owner's Co-ordinate Valuation by DVO

Author
My Tax Expert
16/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 40
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Revenue filed six interconnected appeals against a common order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated September 17, 2001. The respondents/assessees all belon...