Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s. [Assessee Name*]: Determining Capital Cost of Assets and Tax Treatment of Annual Maintenance Contracts (AMC)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 35
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) arrived at a factual determination regarding the treatment of payments made for an Annual Maintenance Contract (AMC). The assessee had entered into a contract...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s Utkal Investment Ltd. – Effect of Section 271(1B) on Recording of Satisfaction for Penalty Proceedings under the Income-tax Act, 1961 | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
16/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 36
Read More »
Facts of the Case Multiple appeals filed by the Revenue, including the appeal against M/s Utkal Investment Ltd., involved a common substantial question of law relating to the recording of satisfaction...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Tyagi Group (ITA No. 664/2008) – Scope of Section 2(22B)(ii) of Income Tax Act: Principle of Consistency Mandates Adoption of Fair Market Value of Unquoted Shares Established in Co-Owners' Case Without Re-Assessment by DVO

Author
My Tax Expert
16/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 37
Read More »
Facts of the Case The matter arose out of six interconnected appeals preferred by the Revenue against a common order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) on September 17, 2001. The ...

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Tyagi Group: Delhi High Court Affirms Rule of Consistency in Determining Fair Market Value of Unquoted Equity Shares under Section 2(22B)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 – Rejection of Repetitive DVO Valuation for Co-Owners/Same Asset Class

Author
My Tax Expert
16/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 40
Read More »
Facts of the Case The six interconnected appeals arose out of a common order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) on September 17, 2001, concerning multiple assessees belonging to the "T...

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Mr. S. Venkatnarayan & Connected Matters (2008) – Effect of Section 271(1B) on Recording of Satisfaction for Penalty Proceedings

Author
My Tax Expert
16/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 34
Read More »
Facts of the CaseA batch of appeals filed by the Revenue came before the Delhi High Court. The common controversy related to the validity of penalty proceedings initiated under Section 271 of the Income Tax Act on the ...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Gulf Air Company: Clarifying TDS Applicability on Hotel Payments and Service Charges under Section 194-I of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
16/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 35
Read More »
·       Facts of the CaseThe respondent, Gulf Air Company, is a non-resident airline operating flights to Mumbai and Delhi. For the assessment year 2001-02, the Assessing Officer (AO) contended th...

Principle of Consistency in Valuation of Unquoted Shares: CIT v. Tyagi Group (2008:DHC:12410-DB) – Delhi High Court Rules on Binding Nature of DVO Reports for Co-owners under Section 2(22B)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
16/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 34
Read More »
Facts of the Case The six conjoined appeals arose out of a common order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) on September 17, 2001. The Assessees belong to the "Tyagi Group" and held ...

Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s SRJ Securities (Now Adinath Capital Pvt. Ltd.) | Delhi High Court on Recording of Satisfaction for Penalty Proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
16/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 37
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed appeals against orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal had decided the matters primarily on the issue that proper satisfaction for initiation of penalty proc...

Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s D.D. Gears Ltd. (Delhi High Court) – Recording of Satisfaction for Penalty Proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
16/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 30
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Revenue preferred an appeal against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal had confined its examination to the issue of recording of satisfaction by...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Tyagi Group (2008:DHC:12420-DB): Principle of Consistency in Fair Market Value (FMV) of Unquoted Equity Shares under Section 2(22B)(ii) of Income Tax Act—Delhi High Court Affirms DVO Valuation of Co-Owners (Anand Group) Prevents Re-assessment Without Demonstrating Error

Author
My Tax Expert
16/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 35
Read More »
Facts of the Case The six conjoined appeals arose out of a common order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated September 17, 2001. All the respective assessees belonged to a collec...