Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
952,151
Growing community

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Principal Commissioner, Central Tax, GST Delhi West vs M/s Alkarma – Scope of Adjudication after Quashing of Show Cause Notice under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944

Author
My Tax Expert
24/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 284
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Respondent, M/s Alkarma, was engaged in fabrication and installation services related to building structures and was registered under the Service Tax regime. The Respondent availed CENVAT credit du...

Tata Teleservices Limited vs Commissioner CGST Delhi East & Anr. – Double Taxation on Prepaid Telecom Services & Maintainability of Writ under Article 226

Author
My Tax Expert
24/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 307
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, Tata Teleservices Limited, is a telecom service provider offering cellular services, SMS, internet/data services, and Value-Added Services (VAS).The dispute arises from taxation on prep...

M/s Kashish Optics Ltd. vs Commissioner, CGST Delhi West & Ors. (Delhi High Court, 2025) – Seizure Beyond 12 Months Invalid Without Notice under Section 67(7) CGST Act

Author
My Tax Expert
24/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 347
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, M/s Kashish Optics Ltd., challenged the continued retention of goods seized by the GST authorities pursuant to a search conducted on 22/23 October 2020, followed by a seizure order date...

Paras Products & Ors. vs Commissioner, Central GST Delhi & Anr. (Delhi High Court, 2025) – Inordinate Delay in Adjudication Vitiates Proceedings under Central Excise Law

Author
My Tax Expert
24/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 270
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present batch of writ petitions involved Paras Products, Sai Enterprises, and Jaina Polymers, who challenged Orders-in-Original dated 30.12.2022 and 02.03.2023 passed by the Central GST authoritie...

Paras Products & Ors. vs Commissioner, Central GST, Delhi & Ors. (2025) – Inordinate Delay in Adjudication Vitiates SCN Proceedings under Central Excise Act

Author
My Tax Expert
24/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 304
Read More »
Facts of the Case Petitioners (Paras Products, Sai Enterprises, and Jaina Polymers) were engaged in manufacturing footwear and soles. Searches were conducted on 29.04.2011, and goods including fini...

Paras Products & Ors. vs Commissioner Central GST Delhi & Anr. (2025) – Delhi High Court Quashes 11-Year Delay in Adjudication under Central Excise Law

Author
My Tax Expert
24/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 282
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners, namely Paras Products, Sai Enterprises, and Jaina Polymers, were engaged in the manufacture of footwear and soles falling under Chapter Headings 6402 and 6406 of the Central Excise Tar...

MS Shyam Indus Power Solutions Pvt. Ltd. vs Principal Commissioner CGST Delhi North (2025) – Delhi High Court | Inordinate Delay in Adjudication Violates Natural Justice; SCNs Quashed under Section 73 Finance Act, 1994

Author
My Tax Expert
24/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 327
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, MS Shyam Indus Power Solutions Pvt. Ltd., challenged an Order dated 23.08.2024 whereby the Respondent imposed: Service Tax Liability: ₹30,68,03,113/- Interest and Pena...

Mansura Brush Works vs Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Service Tax (DGST) & Ors. | Delhi High Court | GST Registration Suspension | Rule 21A CGST Rules

Author
My Tax Expert
24/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 260
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, Mansura Brush Works, through its proprietor Mohammad Hashim, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of a Show Cause Notice dated 28 Novemb...

Commissioner of Central Tax, CGST Delhi East vs M/s Simplex Infrastructure Limited (2025) – Extended Limitation under Section 73(1) of Finance Act Not Invokable Due to Bona Fide Belief

Author
My Tax Expert
24/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 276
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Central Tax challenging the order passed by CESTAT. The dispute pertained to non-payment of service tax by the respondent, a sub-contractor, for the period 2...

Commissioner of Central Tax, CGST Delhi South vs M/s Government Official Welfare Organisation – No Service Tax Liability on Real Estate Facilitation Activities under Finance Act, 1994

Author
My Tax Expert
24/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 263
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Respondent, M/s Government Official Welfare Organisation, was an entity formed by serving and retired government officials. It entered into a Memorandum of Understanding dated 30th July 2009 with M...