Facts of the CaseM/s Asphaultine India and another petitioner challenged an order dated 30.09.2023 issued by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL), directing them to deposit Rs.8,16,709.10 plus applicable GST withi...
Facts of the CaseAkash Yadav sought regular bail in Case Crime No. 182 of 2023, registered at P.S. Robertsganj, District Sonebhadra, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC. He had been in custody since 07.0...
Facts of the CaseGold Line Enterprises filed this writ petition against the State of U.P. and others, seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to pay Rs.5,98,22,866 plus GST, along with Rs.50,00,000 as compensation f...
Facts of the CaseIn a decades-old winding-up proceeding (Company Petition No.25 of 1984) concerning M/s Godavarikhani Chit Fund (P) Limited (in liquidation), the Official Liquidator sought sanction under Sections 457(1)(...
Facts of the CaseThe Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu & Kashmir, filed this appeal under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against an order dated 06.03.2018 passed by the CESTAT, Chandigar...
Facts of the CaseThis is a Central Excise Act appeal, not a GST law dispute, though the appellant department is titled 'Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise' following administrative reorganisation. The Commiss...
Facts of the CaseAn 84-year-old buyer, Bela Rani Bose, paid the entire sale consideration of Rs.65,16,000/- (including a GST component of Rs.6,01,000/-, per the price break-up) for a 3BHK flat under an Agreement of Sale ...
Facts of the CaseHarmander Singh, a former long-serving employee of the complainant-company Satia Industries Limited, sought anticipatory bail in FIR No. 93 dated 27.05.2025, registered at Sadar Sri Muktsar Sahib for off...
Facts of the CaseThis case concerns Service Tax under the Finance Act, 1994 — a pre-GST levy — though the dispute was litigated and decided after GST's introduction, and draws on a GST-era Supreme Court precedent. NT...
Facts of the CaseTwo connected writ petitions were decided together — W.P.(C) No. 20 of 2022 filed by Zydus Wellness Products Limited and W.P.(C) No. 27 of 2022 filed by Alkem Laboratories Limited — both against the ...