Facts of the Case
The petitioner, L. Satheek, proprietor of M/s. Lakshmanan and Co, had challenged assessment orders passed by the State Tax Officer (Works Contract), State GST Department, Kollam, for the years 2009-201...
Facts of the CaseThis is a Central Excise Act appeal, decided on limitation grounds, and does not touch GST law. The Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise (J&K), Jammu, filed an appeal under Section 35-G of the ...
Facts of the CaseThis is a straightforward government-payment dispute, and the reference to GST is limited to the bill amount being GST-inclusive. The petitioner-firm was awarded a work order dated 23 January 2020 by the...
Facts of the Case
The petitioner, K. Murugan, an ex-serviceman executing works contracts for the Public Works Department, was registered under Service Tax during the VAT regime and was assessed for service tax for 2013-...
Facts of the CaseThis is a criminal law matter concerning custody of seized goods, not a GST case — the petitioner's business being 'duly registered under GST' is mentioned only as one fact supporting his claim of bein...
Facts of the CaseThis order concerns a pre-GST Sales Tax matter and has no application to GST law. M/s Utkal Polyweave Industries (P) Ltd., Balasore, had filed Sales Tax Revision (STREV) No. 274 of 2008, a revision petit...
Facts of the Case
The petitioner, Carpet Export Promotion Council, a Section 25 company set up by the Ministry of Textiles to promote export of Indian handmade carpets, was subjected to a service tax audit for the perio...
Facts of the CaseThis is a service-law dispute concerning an employee of the CBIC/GST department, but the ruling itself decides a question of disciplinary and superannuation law, not GST law. The Union of India and CBIC ...
Facts of the CaseThis is a government contract payment dispute, not a GST law ruling. The petitioner, a contractor, had executed four irrigation works under separate agreements for the Water Resources Department, West Go...
Facts of the Case
This Civil Application was filed within a pending Public Interest Litigation (PIL No. 98 of 2021) concerning the administration of the Shree Sai Baba Sansthan Shirdi. The Sansthan sought the Bombay Hig...