Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
948,627
Growing community

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Vikas Kumar alias Raja & Others vs State of Uttarakhand – Bail Granted in Sections 392, 411 read with Section 34 IPC Case Due to Doubtful Midnight Identification and Absence of Evidence Regarding Source of Light

Author
My Tax Expert
06/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 47
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe applicants, namely Vikas Kumar alias Raja, Sumit alias Sumit Kumar and Titu, were in judicial custody in connection with FIR/Case Crime No. 103 of 2022, registered under Sections 392 and 411 IPC re...

Haldia Petrochemicals Ltd. vs Commissioner of State Taxes & Ors. – Calcutta High Court Allows Revision of TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 for Transitional Credit; Earlier Adverse Observations Vacated in View of Supreme Court’s FILCO Directions | Section 140 of CGST/WBGST Act, 2017

Author
My Tax Expert
06/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 40
Read More »
Facts of the CaseHaldia Petrochemicals Ltd. preferred an intra-court appeal against the order dated 01.07.2022 passed by the learned Single Bench. The appellant raised various grounds challenging the impugned order, wh...

Sunderasan N. vs Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Ltd. – Kerala High Court Directs DRT to Decide Interim Application Before SARFAESI Auction | Section 17 of SARFAESI Act

Author
My Tax Expert
06/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 38
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Sunderasan N., aged 73 years, was a guarantor in respect of a loan extended by Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Ltd. to respondents 3 to 5. Certain property belonging to the petitioner was prop...

Star Cement Ltd. vs Union of India & Ors.: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Challenge to GST Budgetary Support Scheme; Section 174(2)(c) CGST Act Bars Continuation of Rescinded Excise Incentive, but Liberty Granted for Representation on Legitimate Expectation

Author
My Tax Expert
06/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 35
Read More »
Facts of the CaseA batch of writ petitions was filed by industrial units operating in the North-Eastern Region, including Star Cement Ltd., Assam Enterprise LLP, Assam Roofing Ltd., PDP Steels Ltd., Century Plyboards ...

Vikas Kumar alias Raja & Others vs State of Uttarakhand – Bail Granted Under Sections 392, 411 read with Section 34 IPC Where Midnight Identification Was Doubtful Due to Absence of Evidence of Source of Light

Author
My Tax Expert
06/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 40
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe three bail applications arose from the same FIR and were therefore decided by the High Court through a common order.The applicants, namely Vikas Kumar alias Raja, Sumit alias Sumit Kumar and Titu, ...

Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise J&K, Jammu vs M/s Gaurav Agro-Chem Industries – Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1994 – High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal Concerning Refund of Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess on Parity with Earlier Batch Judgment

Author
My Tax Expert
06/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 45
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu and Kashmir, Jammu filed an appeal before the High Court under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1994, challenging an order of the Customs...

IBM India Private Limited vs Union of India & Others – Karnataka High Court Quashes Rejection of SVLDRS Declaration as Non-Speaking and Unreasoned; Fresh Consideration Directed under Section 123(b) of the Finance Act, 2019

Author
My Tax Expert
06/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 38
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, IBM India Private Limited, approached the Karnataka High Court challenging an email/communication dated 11 March 2020 issued by Respondent No. 4, whereby its declaration under the Sabka...

Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise J&K, Jammu vs M/s Gaurav Agro-Chem Industries – Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1994 – High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal Concerning Refund of Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess to Maintain Parity with Earlier Coordinate Bench Judgment

Author
My Tax Expert
06/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 46
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu and Kashmir, Jammu filed the appeal before the High Court under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1994, challenging an order of the Custom...

Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise J&K, Jammu vs M/s Gaurav Agro-Chem Industries: High Court Dismisses Section 35G Appeal Against Refund of Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess

Author
My Tax Expert
06/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 42
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu and Kashmir, Jammu filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1994 against an order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service...

Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise J&K, Jammu vs M/s Gaurav Agro-Chem Industries – Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 – High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal on Refund of Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess to Maintain Parity with Earlier Batch Judgment

Author
My Tax Expert
06/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 41
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu and Kashmir, Jammu filed an appeal before the High Court under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, challenging an order passed by the ...