Facts of the Case
The petitioner's GST registration was cancelled by order dated 01.03.2023 after the petitioner defaulted on GST payment in the month of June (of the relevant year). Registration cancellation under the ...
Facts of the Case
The petitioner, M/S Gujral Sons, challenged fresh provisional attachment orders in Form GST DRC-22 dated 03.02.2026, attaching its bank accounts, after an initial provisional attachment order dated 13....
Facts of the Case
The petitioner, M/s JBT (Jai Bharath Travels), engaged in plying passenger buses across Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, challenged an Assessment-cum-Penalty-cum-Interest order (DI...
Facts of the Case
The petitioner, Plus Max Duty Free (Madurai) Pvt. Ltd., a subsidiary of a Malaysian company operating Duty Free Shops at various airports, held premises within Madurai International Airport under a Lic...
Facts of the Case
The petitioner, M/s Unique Enterprises, a proprietary concern dealing in iron, metal and scrap, challenged provisional attachment orders dated 03.11.2022 and 04.11.2022 issued under Section 83 of the A...
Facts of the Case
The applicant, Hira Gobind Bhatia, Director of Photocom Industries (India) Pvt. Ltd., sought anticipatory bail apprehending arrest after being served summons under Section 70 of the CGST Act. The Anti-...
Facts of the Case
The respondent, M/s Ravi Trading Company, had its goods — arecanut, a perishable commodity — detained and confiscated by order dated 09.01.2023 under Section 130 of the CGST Act, 2017 read with the...
Facts of the Case
The petitioner, Blue Bell Jewellers, challenged a Form GST MOV-10 notice dated 19.07.2023 issued by the second respondent, proposing confiscation of goods under Section 130 of the CGST Act. Various del...
Facts of the Case
The petitioner, Om Sai Security, Rourkela, had earlier succeeded in its first appeal (No.AD210422007821R dated 28.04.2022) before the Joint Commissioner of CT & GST (Appeal), Sundargarh Territorial...
Facts of the Case
The petitioner, Tvl. Ideal Marketing, challenged an assessment order dated 31.10.2025 passed under Section 73 of the TNGST Act, 2017 for the year 2021-22, which was made ex-parte because the petitioner...