Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,673,404
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now
Showing filtered results. Clear filters

Meenatchisundaram vs Commissioner, Commercial Tax Department – GST on Seigniorage Fee for Quarry Operations: Recovery Restrained Pending Objections in Light of Lakhwinder Singh Case

Author
My Tax Expert
20/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 157
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Meenatchisundaram, was carrying on quarry operations after obtaining the necessary licence/permit under the Tamil Nadu Minor and Mineral Concession Rules, 1959.The licence/permit had be...

Bindu Bhusan Banik vs Union of India & Others – Gauhati High Court Permits Withdrawal of Writ Petition with Liberty to File Fresh Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

Author
My Tax Expert
20/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 113
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Bindu Bhusan Banik, Proprietor of M/s. Bindu Bhusan Banik, filed a writ petition before the Gauhati High Court against the Union of India and various officers of the Central Goods and...

Swastik Plastics vs Commissioner of DGST (Delhi High Court) – Release of Seized Goods After Assessment Order | W.P.(C) No. 10278/2021 | GST Case Law

Author
My Tax Expert
20/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 131
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Swastik Plastics, approached the Delhi High Court by filing a writ petition seeking appropriate relief regarding the detention and release of goods by the Department. During the pendenc...

Alavumkudy Moosan Alshas vs State Tax Officer – Kerala High Court Stays GST Recovery on Payment of 20% Disputed Tax Under Section 112(8)(b) Due to Non-Constitution of GST Appellate Tribunal

Author
My Tax Expert
20/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 106
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Alavumkudy Moosan Alshas, was subjected to an assessment order referred to in the judgment as Ext.P1.The assessment order related to the year 2017-18 and had been issued by the State Ta...

Subhojit Kumar Roy vs State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Cyber Crime Police Station, Thoothukudi

Author
My Tax Expert
20/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 116
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Subhojit Kumar Roy (Accused No.1), sought regular bail before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court after being arrested in Crime No.14 of 2022 registered by the Cyber Crime Polic...

Smt. Shailaja Chandrashekar vs Additional Commissioner of Central Tax (Appeals) – Appeal Against GST Registration Cancellation Maintainable Under Section 107 Despite Revocation Remedy Under Section 30 of CGST Act

Author
My Tax Expert
20/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 100
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Smt. Shailaja Chandrashekar, approached the Karnataka High Court challenging the Order-in-Appeal dated 22 April 2022 passed by the Additional Commissioner of Central Tax (Appeals).The p...

M/s Eastmen Auto and Power Limited vs Union of India & Others – Patna High Court | Section 74 of CGST/BGST Act | Assessment Order Quashed for Violation of Mandatory 30-Day Statutory Period

Author
My Tax Expert
20/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 128
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Eastmen Auto and Power Limited, challenged multiple actions initiated by the State Tax authorities relating to the rejection of its TRAN-1 transitional input tax credit claim ...

Manoj Yadav vs State of Chhattisgarh – Regular Bail Granted Under Section 439 CrPC in Alleged GST and Income-tax Fraud Case Involving Sections 420, 467, 468 IPC and Section 66-D IT Act

Author
My Tax Expert
20/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 104
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe applicant, Manoj Yadav, filed his second bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking regular bail in connection with Crime No. 55/2021 registered at Police St...

The District Collector & District Commissioner, Bellary & Another vs Shri K. Nagaraja (Proprietor, Sri Lakshmi Fertilizers & Pesticides) – Karnataka High Court | Sections 6A & 6C of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 read with Clauses 28 & 31 of the Fertilizer (Control) Order, 1985

Author
My Tax Expert
20/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 139
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe respondent, Shri K. Nagaraja, proprietor of a fertilizer dealership, possessed a valid authorization under the Fertilizer (Control) Order, 1985 for carrying on the business of retail sale of ferti...

The Official Liquidator of M/s Testeels Ltd. (In Liquidation) vs NA – Gujarat High Court Permits Minimum Wages Plus Applicable CGST and SGST for Security Agency Under Section 457 of Companies Act, 1956 and Rule 9 of Companies (Court) Rules, 1959

Author
My Tax Expert
20/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 104
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Official Liquidator of M/s Testeels Ltd. (In Liquidation) filed a further report before the Gujarat High Court seeking modified relief concerning the monthly security bills of M/s Shubham Protectio...