Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Showing filtered results. Clear filters
Richmond Uniforms vs Thiruvananthapuram Corporation & Others – Tenant Cannot Be Arbitrarily Denied Trade Licence Renewal for Landlord’s Failure to Pay Property Tax; Rule 18 of Kerala Municipality Property Tax Rules, 2011
Facts
of the CaseRichmond
Uniforms, the petitioner, approached the High Court of Kerala being aggrieved
by the non-renewal of its Trade Licence by the Corporation authorities.The
petitioner was carrying on its establ...
W.P. No. 34045 of 2022: GST Registration Cancellation Without Opportunity to Reply — Fresh Representation for Restoration Under Section 30 Read With Rule 22(4)
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner filed the writ petition challenging the order
passed by the 1st respondent cancelling the petitioner’s GST Registration No.
37DDRPS1865Q1ZA dated 04.01.2022.The petitioner’s principa...
Jerin T.J. vs State Tax Officer (Int.), Mobile Squad No. II, Kerala State GST Department – Kerala High Court Dismisses Writ Petition as Infructuous | WP(C) No. 7422 of 2022
Facts
of the CaseThe
petitioner, Jerin T.J., aged 45 years and proprietor of Best Gold,
approached the High Court of Kerala by filing WP(C) No. 7422 of 2022
against the State Tax Officer (Int.), Mobile Squad No. II, ...
Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise J&K Jammu vs M/s R B Jodhamal and Co. Pvt. Ltd.: High Court Dismisses Central Excise Appeal as Squarely Covered by Leading Case M/s Narbada Industries (CEA No. 10/2020) and Connected Appeals
Facts of the CaseThe Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, J&K,
Jammu, preferred Central Excise Appeal No. 258/2022 before the High Court of
Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh at Jammu against M/s R B Jodhama...
Sheeba Rani vs M/s Grand Enterprises & Others – Tenant Must Deposit Entire Admitted Rent Arrears to Contest Appeal; No Set-Off Against Alleged Deposit Permissible Under Section 12(1) of Kerala Rent Control Act
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Sheeba Rani, was the tenant and appellant in
R.C.A. No. 4/2022 pending before the Rent Control Appellate Authority,
Ernakulam. An order of eviction had been passed against her by the Re...
Bharat Bhushan @ Ashu vs State of Punjab & Connected Cases — Sections 438 & 439 Cr.P.C. | Regular and Anticipatory Bail Denied in Alleged Foodgrain Transportation, Labour Cartage and Corruption Scam
Facts of the CaseThe petitions arose from FIR No. 11 dated 16.08.2022
registered at Police Station Vigilance Bureau, District Ludhiana, under
Sections 420, 409, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC and Sections 7, 8, 12 and 13(...
M/s ib Track Solutions Pvt. Ltd. & Sudhendra Dhakanikote vs State of Karnataka & Another – Karnataka High Court Refuses to Quash FIR over Alleged Deliberate Switching-Off of RFID E-Seal Tamper Alerts; National Security Paramount | Sections 66C & 72A IT Act, Sections 406, 420 & 34 IPC and Section 482 CrPC
Facts of the CaseM/s ib Track Solutions Pvt. Ltd., the first petitioner, was a
company engaged in procuring and supplying electronic seals using Radio
Frequency Identification (RFID) technology for exporters from India...
M/s Royal Enterprises vs Union of India & Others – Patna High Court Allows GST Demand of Rs. 1.33 Crore with Statutory Interest to Be Paid in Six Equal Installments; DRC-13 Bank Account Attachment and Third-Party Recovery Suspended | Section 80 and Section 79 of GST Act
Facts of the CaseM/s Royal Enterprises, through its proprietor Pawan Kumar
Mishra, approached the Patna High Court challenging coercive GST recovery
proceedings initiated pursuant to a demand reflected in FORM GST DRC-...
Raja Mohammed vs District Collector & Ors. – Madras High Court Closes Article 226 Writ Challenge to Panchayat Order on House Tax Receipt After Withdrawal; Liberty Granted to Apply Before Appropriate Authority
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Raja Mohammed, approached the Madurai
Bench of the Madras High Court by filing W.P.(MD) No. 21488 of 2022 under Article
226 of the Constitution of India.The respondents were:
The
...
M/s Hariom Mines and Minerals vs Union of India & Ors. – Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Challenge to GST Demand on Mining Royalty Following Sudarshan Lal Gupta Case; Declines Different View Despite Pending Supreme Court Proceedings
Facts of the CaseM/s Hariom Mines and Minerals, through its partner Mr.
Hemendra Kalal, filed a writ petition before the Rajasthan High Court at
Jodhpur challenging the impugned orders/notice issued by the respondent
...