Facts of the
CaseM/s S.S. Diagnostics and Surgical, a proprietorship
firm, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 31.03.2022 passed by
the Assistant Commissioner of State Taxes, Patna North Circle, Patna, u...
Facts of the CasePrathiba Shikshana Samithi (Regd.), respondent No. 2, had been
allotted a civic amenity site. The lease granted in its favour was due to
expire on 25 February 2014. Thereafter, respondent No. 2 submitt...
Facts of the CaseThe Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Jammu filed an
appeal before the High Court under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act,
1944, challenging an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Ap...
Facts of the CaseThe Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Jammu filed the
present appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against
an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, ...
Facts of the CaseThe Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Jammu filed the
present appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against
an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal,...
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Navrang Infrastructures Inc., was a
proprietorship concern stated to be engaged in construction activities.The petitioner had constructed flats for the Haryana Housing
Board. According ...
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Jyothy Constructions, was an ‘A’
Class Government Contractor and had successfully participated in a bidding
process concerning work awarded by the Kerala Water Authority. Pursua...
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Ramar Andavar, filed a writ petition under
Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the respondent’s order
bearing Reference No. ZA3305221035161 dated 25.05.2022. The peti...
Facts of the CaseThe Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Jammu filed the
present appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against
an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, ...
Facts of the CaseShree Jagannath Construction filed a writ petition before the
High Court of Orissa at Cuttack in relation to the delayed filing of an
application for revocation under the proviso to Rule 23 of the Odis...