Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Showing filtered results. Clear filters
M/s. HSIL Limited – Packaging Products Division vs Union of India & Others — Challenge to ₹1.07 Crore GST Interest Recovery for Delayed GSTR-3B Filing and Transitional Credit; Writ Petition Dismissed as Withdrawn
Facts of the CaseM/s. HSIL Limited – Packaging Products Division filed a writ
petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the
Telangana High Court challenging a letter dated 22.04.2019, followed by...
Tvl. Bagavathiamman Magalir Sangam Vs. The State Tax Officer: Principles of Natural Justice and Quashing of Ex-Parte GST Assessment Order Passed under Section 73 of TNGST/CGST Act 2017 due to Technical Issues and Portal-Only Notifications
Facts of the Case
The
petitioner, Tvl. Bagavathiamman Magalir Sangam, represented by its
Secretary K. Rajammal, is located in Dindigul, Tamil Nadu.
The
respondent, the State Tax Officer, Vedasandur...
M/s Rishav Enterprises Vs Union of India & Others: Jharkhand High Court Disposes Writ Petition Granting Liberty to Appeal Order Before the GST Appellate Tribunal Under Section 112 of the CGST Act, 2017
Facts of the Case
The
petitioner, M/s Rishav Enterprises, is a proprietary concern managed by
its proprietor, Smt. Rakhi Agarwal, operating from Jamshedpur, District
East Singhbhum, Jharkhand.
The
...
M/s. Punjabi Restaurant Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of CGST and C.Ex: Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order and Bank Attachment Issued Against Sole Proprietorship for Dues Incurred by a Predecessor Partnership Firm Under Article 226
Facts of the Case
The
Petitioner's Identity: The petitioner is M/s. Punjabi
Restaurant, situated in Madurai, currently represented by its sole
proprietor, P. Sudha.
The
Impugned Order: The re...
Principal Commissioner of GST and Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Commissionerate vs M/s. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd. – CENVAT Credit on Capital Goods Used in Captive Power Plant Allowed Despite Sale of 75% Surplus Power to Another Unit | Section 2(e), Rule 57AA and Rule 2
Facts of the CaseM/s. Konark Met Coke Ltd. (“KMCL”) established a Metallurgical
Coke Plant along with a Captive Power Plant (“CPP”). The CPP was intended to
generate electricity for consumption connected with K...
Principal Commissioner of GST and Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Commissionerate vs M/s. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd. – CENVAT Credit on Capital Goods Used in Captive Power Plant Allowed Despite Sale of 75% Surplus Power to Another Unit | Section 2(e), Rule 57AA and Rule 2
Facts of the CaseM/s. Konark Met Coke Ltd. (“KMCL”) established a Metallurgical
Coke Plant along with a Captive Power Plant (“CPP”). The CPP was intended to
generate electricity for consumption connected with K...
M/s Bright Asset Transit Private Limited vs Assistant Commissioner (Circle), Kuzhithurai Assessment Circle – Madras High Court Allows Revival of GST Registration Cancelled for Non-Filing of Returns Under Section 29 of the CGST Act
Facts of the CaseM/s Bright Asset Transit Private Limited filed a writ petition
under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order bearing
Reference No. ZA330422075318O dated 20.04.2022, whereby its G...
Sidhivinayak Chemtech Private Limited vs Principal Commissioner, CGST, Meerut & Ors. – Delhi High Court Directs Speaking Order on GST DRC-22A Objections Against Provisional Attachment
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Sidhivinayak Chemtech Private
Limited, approached the Delhi High Court in W.P.(C) 16084/2022 against the
Principal Commissioner, CGST, Meerut and other respondents. The petitioner’s
...
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. vs Quader Hussain & Andhra Pradesh State Wakf Board – Telangana High Court Disposes Section 96 CPC Appeal on Compromise Terms Governing Waqf Property Lease, Direct Rent Payment and 15% Rent Enhancement Every Three Years
Facts of the
CaseThe dispute concerned property bearing Municipal
No. 6-2-1 (Old) / 6-2-2 (New), situated at Lakdikapul, Hyderabad, admeasuring
1103.70 square yards. Respondent No. 1 was the Muttawalli of Masjid-e-Hus...
M/s. Mundkar Madhavaraya Prabhu vs State of Karnataka & Ors. – Karnataka High Court Directs Release of Perishable Goods and Conveyances Within 48 Hours; Statutory Appeal Remedy Preserved Against GST MOV-09 Penalty Orders Under Sections 129(1)(a), 129(1)(b) and 129(3) of the CGST Act, 2017
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, M/s. Mundkar Madhavaraya Prabhu,
approached the Karnataka High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India challenging two orders, namely Order No. 09/2022-23 and Order No.
1...