Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Showing filtered results. Clear filters
Commissioner, Central Excise & Customs, Bhubaneswar-I Commissionerate vs M/s. Rexon Strips Ltd. – Orissa High Court Dismisses Department Appeal for Procedural Default and Low Tax Effect | Monetary Limit for Departmental Appeals
Facts of the
CaseThe Appellant, Commissioner, Central Excise
& Customs, Bhubaneswar-I Commissionerate, filed an appeal before the
Hon'ble Orissa High Court against M/s. Rexon Strips Ltd. However, for
nearly three...
Rekha Saxena vs Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax, Delhi West & Others | GST Registration Cancellation Set Aside Due to Non-Application of Mind | Section 29 & Section 107 CGST Act
Facts of the Case
The petitioner's GST registration was cancelled by an order dated 16.09.2019.
The cancellation order referred to the petitioner's reply dated 12.09.2019,
yet simultaneously recorded that no re...
Secutech Automation (India) Private Limited vs. State of Gujarat | Cancellation of GST Registration Quashed Due to Cryptic Show Cause Notice | Section 29(2) CGST Act & Rule 22 CGST Rules
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Secutech Automation (India)
Private Limited, was engaged in providing automation systems to hospitals
and was duly registered under Section 22 of the Central Goods and Services
Tax Ac...
Godrej Consumer Products Limited vs Union of India & Others | J&K High Court Upholds Denial of GST Budgetary Support to Units Not Availing Excise Exemption Before 01.07.2017 | Sections 174 CGST Act, Section 5A Central Excise Act, Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 265 & 300A of Constitution
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Godrej Consumer Products Limited,
is a Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) manufacturer having manufacturing units
situated at Kathua and Samba in the erstwhile State of Jammu & Kash...
Srinivasa Rao Kudupudi (Advocate for Petitioner) vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes & Anr. — High Court of Andhra Pradesh Condoned Delay in GST Appeal Under Section 107 & Remitted Cancellation Order Under Section 29(2) Due to Non-Constitution of GST Appellate Tribunal (Writ Petition No. 42201 of 2022)
Facts of the Case
The
1st Respondent (Primary Authority) cancelled the GST registration of the
petitioner via an order dated June 14, 2022, effective retrospectively
from December 31, 2021.
The
...
Hem Lata Gupta & Anr. Vs. Charanjeet Kumar Dutta & Anr. — Quashing of Criminal Cognizance Under Section 482 Cr.P.C Due to Incomplete Inquiry of Forgery Allegations Under Section 202 Cr.P.C
Facts of the Case
Parties
& Property: The petitioner No.1 is a tenant of a shop
owned by respondent No.1. The dispute arose around a commercial premises
situated at Rehari Colony, Jammu.
The
...
M/s Godrej Consumer Products Limited Vs Union of India and Others: Denial of GST Budgetary Support to Units whose Central Excise Area-Based Exemption Expired Prior to July 1, 2017: High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh Affirming Strict Interpretation of Tax Notifications and Overriding Public Interest over Promissory Estoppel
Facts of the Case
Corporate
Profile & Infrastructure: The Petitioner, M/s Godrej
Consumer Products Limited, is a Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) company
manufacturing household insecticides, per...
Forged Rent Agreement for GST Registration: High Court Sets Aside Summoning Order for Want of Expert Opinion under Section 202 CrPC | Hem Lata Gupta & Anr. v. Charanjeet Kumar Dutta & Anr.
Case LawHem Lata Gupta & Anr. v. Charanjeet Kumar Dutta &
Anr.Court: High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh
at JammuCase No.: CRM(M) No. 278/2021, CrlM No. 517/2021Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Chatter...
Godrej Consumer Products Limited v. Union of India & Others: Denial of GST Budgetary Support to Units Not Availing Excise Exemption Immediately Before 1st July 2017 — High Court of J&K and Ladakh Upholds Strict Interpretation of Eligibility Criteria
Godrej Consumer Products
Limited v. Union of India & Others: Denial of GST Budgetary Support to
Units Not Availing Excise Exemption Immediately Before 1st July 2017 — High
Court of J&K and Ladakh Upholds Str...
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 vs. Electrical and Electronic India Ltd. — Section 69 (Unexplained Investment) | Protective vs Substantive Addition | No Substantial Question of Law
Facts of the
Case
The assessee allegedly made investments amounting to ₹4,05,00,000
in the JP Minda Group.
The Assessing Officer made:
Substantive addition in
the hands of JP Minda Group.
...