Facts of the
CaseThe writ petition was registered as W.P. No.
21326 of 2019.When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned
counsel appearing for the petitioner informed the Court that, pursuant to the
Court’s di...
Facts of the
CaseThe applicant, Kaushal Kumar Sharma, filed
the bail application seeking release on bail during the pendency of trial in
Case Crime No. 557 of 2021, arising from proceedings of the Directorate General
...
Facts of the
CaseBhuvan Constructions, represented by its proprietor
Sri Obaiah Siddaiah, challenged the cancellation of its Goods and Services Tax
registration. The GST registration had been cancelled by the second r...
Facts of the
CaseThe Petitioner, L. Sankar, filed a writ
petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the
Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court seeking issuance of a Writ of
Mandamus directing the ...
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, M/s. Loyal Furniture and
Interiors, a sole proprietorship concern, challenged before the Karnataka
High Court an order dated 26.03.2024 passed under Section 73 of the
CGST/KGST Act, 2...
Facts of the
CaseM/s Manappuram Finance Ltd., a non-banking finance
company and an assessee under the GST regime, filed the writ petition
challenging the appellate order to the extent it held that the petitioner was
...
Best SEO-Friendly Case Law TitleFacts of the
CaseThe petitioner, L. Sankar, instituted
W.P.(MD) No. 11544 of 2017 before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court
against the Commissioner, Customs House, New Harbor E...
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioners, Amit Kumar Mishra and another,
approached the Orissa High Court seeking anticipatory bail under Section 438
of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, apprehending arrest for their
all...
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Tvl. V.N.S Construction,
challenged an assessment order dated 29.01.2026 passed by the respondent under Section
74 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (TNGST Act) for th...
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Tvl. V.N.S. Construction,
represented by its proprietor K. Vetrivel, challenged the assessment order
dated 29.01.2026 passed by the respondent, the State Tax Officer (Review),
under S...