Facts of the Case
The
Appellant, the Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise (Jammu and
Kashmir), Jammu, preferred an appeal under Section 35G of the Central
Excise Act, 1944 against the respon...
Facts of the Case
The
Appellant, the Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) and
Central Excise, Jammu, filed an appeal (CEA No. 326/2022 along with CM
Nos. 6627/2022 and 6628/2022) befo...
Facts of the Case
The
Appellant, the Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Jammu, preferred a
statutory appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
The
appeal was preferred against ...
Facts of the Case
The
Parties: The appellant in this case is the
Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Jammu, represented by learned
counsel Mr. Jagpaul Singh. The respondent is M/s Cadila Pharmace...
Facts of the CaseThe case originated from a tax dispute wherein the
Adjudicating Authority and the Commissioner (Appeals) had initially issued
orders adverse to the assessee regarding tax refunds. The respondent, M/S
...
Facts of the Case
The
Appellant, the Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Jammu, filed an
appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (referred to as
'the Act'), challenging an order p...
Facts of the Case
The
Appellant, the Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise (Jammu and
Kashmir), Jammu, preferred an appeal under Section 35G of the Central
Excise Act, 1944.
The
appe...
Facts of the Case
The
Petitioner's Profile: Petitioner No. 1, M/s Adisan
Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., is a private limited company engaged in business
operations, and Petitioner No. 2 is its Shareholder an...
Facts of the Case
The
Parties: Petitioner No. 1, Adisan Laboratories Pvt.
Ltd., is a private limited company based in Pune, and Petitioner No. 2 is
its Shareholder & Managing Director. The Respond...
Facts of the Case
The
Appellant, the Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise (Jammu and
Kashmir), Jammu, preferred an appeal under Section 35G of the Central
Excise Act, 1944.
The
appeal chal...