Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
948,803
Growing community

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Jammu vs M/S Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd | Maintainability of Revenue Appeals under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944 Regarding Refund of Education Cess and SHEC in Light of Apex Court Precedents

Author
My Tax Expert
06/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 32
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Appellant, the Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise (Jammu and Kashmir), Jammu, preferred an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the respon...

Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Jammu vs M/s Nanda Mint and Pine Chemicals Limited: Dismissal of Revenue Appeal Under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944 Regarding Refund of Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess in Light of Supreme Court Mandate

Author
My Tax Expert
06/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 38
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Appellant, the Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) and Central Excise, Jammu, filed an appeal (CEA No. 326/2022 along with CM Nos. 6627/2022 and 6628/2022) befo...

Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Jammu v/s M/S Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd. | Refund of Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 in Light of Supreme Court Mandate in M/s SRD Nutrients Pvt. Ltd.

Author
My Tax Expert
06/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 38
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Appellant, the Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Jammu, preferred a statutory appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appeal was preferred against ...

Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Jammu v/s M/s Cadila Pharmaceuticals Limited: High Court Dismisses Central Excise Appeal on Refund of Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess Under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act Following Precedent

Author
My Tax Expert
06/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 38
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Parties: The appellant in this case is the Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Jammu, represented by learned counsel Mr. Jagpaul Singh. The respondent is M/s Cadila Pharmace...

Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Jammu vs M/S Saraswati Agro Chemicals Pvt. Ltd.: High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal Under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944 Regardng Refund of Education Cess Following Apex Court Precedent in SRD Nutrients Case

Author
My Tax Expert
06/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 35
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe case originated from a tax dispute wherein the Adjudicating Authority and the Commissioner (Appeals) had initially issued orders adverse to the assessee regarding tax refunds. The respondent, M/S ...

Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Jammu v/s Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd.: Maintainability of Revenue Appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act Against CESS Refund Allowability Post-SRD Nutrients Ruling

Author
My Tax Expert
06/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 39
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Appellant, the Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Jammu, filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (referred to as 'the Act'), challenging an order p...

Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Jammu vs M/S Shiva Mint Industries: High Court Dismisses Central Excise Appeal Concerning Refund of Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess Under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 in View of Supreme Court Precedent in M/s SRD Nutrients Pvt. Ltd.

Author
My Tax Expert
06/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 40
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Appellant, the Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise (Jammu and Kashmir), Jammu, preferred an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appe...

Adisan Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs Union of India & Ors. | Principle of Natural Justice Violated: High Court Quashes Refund Rejection Order Due to Non-Service of Notice Under Section 54 of CGST Act, 2017 Read With Rule 92(3) of CGST Rules, 2017 As Notice Was Neither Served Nor Uploaded on GSTN Portal

Author
My Tax Expert
06/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 26
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Petitioner's Profile: Petitioner No. 1, M/s Adisan Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., is a private limited company engaged in business operations, and Petitioner No. 2 is its Shareholder an...

Adisan Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Union of India & Ors. – Bombay High Court Quashes GST Refund Rejection Order for Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Service of Form GST RFD-08 Notice on GSTN Portal under Section 54 of CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 92(3) of CGST Rules, 2017

Author
My Tax Expert
06/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 25
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Parties: Petitioner No. 1, Adisan Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., is a private limited company based in Pune, and Petitioner No. 2 is its Shareholder & Managing Director. The Respond...

Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Jammu vs. Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd.: Maintainability of High Court Appeal Under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act Against CESTAT Order Granting Refund of Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess in Light of Supreme Court Precedents

Author
My Tax Expert
06/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 26
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Appellant, the Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise (Jammu and Kashmir), Jammu, preferred an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appeal chal...