Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
949,170
Growing community

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

K. Rajan vs. State Tax Officer & Others: Kerala High Court Grants Interim Protection from Tax Recovery Pending Delay Condonation and Stay Applications Before the KVAT Appellate Tribunal under Section 55/60 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003

Author
My Tax Expert
06/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 17
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, K. Rajan, is the proprietor of M/s. Dhanya Saw Mills based in Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala. The petitioner was aggrieved by an assessment order (Exhibit P1) issued b...

Shiba Prasad Panda vs The Executive Engineer, Rural Water Supply & Sanitation Division, Keonjhar and Others – GST Differential Tax Reimbursement on Pre-GST Works Contracts | Revised Odisha Finance Department Guidelines Dated 10.12.2018

Author
My Tax Expert
06/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 20
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner filed the writ petition challenging the action of the Opposite Parties in not reimbursing the differential tax amount arising from the change in the indirect tax regime from Value Added...

Charan Singh vs State of Haryana and Another – Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Regular Bail in Alleged Fake GST Firm and Paper Transaction Fraud under Section 132(1)(B) & 132(1)(C) of the HGST Act, 2017 and Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B IPC

Author
My Tax Expert
06/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 18
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner sought regular bail in connection with FIR No. 8 dated 05.01.2019, registered at Police Station Kanina, District Mahendergarh, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC and Sectio...

Shiba Prasad Panda vs The Executive Engineer, Rural Water Supply & Sanitation Division, Keonjhar and Others – Orissa High Court Directs Consideration of GST Differential Tax Reimbursement for Pre-GST Works Contracts Under Revised Guidelines Dated 10.12.2018

Author
My Tax Expert
06/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 17
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner challenged the action of the Opposite Parties in not reimbursing the differential tax amount arising from the change in the tax regime from Value Added Tax (VAT) to Goods and Services ...

M/s RD Construction and General Traders vs Commissioner of CT & GST, Odisha and Another – Orissa High Court Permits Statutory Appeal with Condonation of Delay Due to Pendency of Writ Petition

Author
My Tax Expert
06/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 15
Read More »
Facts of the CaseM/s RD Construction and General Traders filed a writ petition before the Orissa High Court challenging an impugned order passed against it. During consideration of the writ petition, the issue arose ...

Adisan Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs Union of India & Ors. | Principle of Natural Justice Violated: High Court Quashes Refund Rejection Order Due to Non-Service of Notice Under Section 54 of CGST Act, 2017 Read With Rule 92(3) of CGST Rules, 2017 As Notice Was Neither Served Nor Uploaded on GSTN Portal

Author
My Tax Expert
06/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 18
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Petitioner's Profile: Petitioner No. 1, M/s Adisan Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., is a private limited company engaged in business operations, and Petitioner No. 2 is its Shareholder an...

Adisan Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Union of India & Ors. – Bombay High Court Quashes GST Refund Rejection Order for Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Service of Form GST RFD-08 Notice on GSTN Portal under Section 54 of CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 92(3) of CGST Rules, 2017

Author
My Tax Expert
06/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 19
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Parties: Petitioner No. 1, Adisan Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., is a private limited company based in Pune, and Petitioner No. 2 is its Shareholder & Managing Director. The Respond...

Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Jammu vs. Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd.: Maintainability of High Court Appeal Under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act Against CESTAT Order Granting Refund of Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess in Light of Supreme Court Precedents

Author
My Tax Expert
06/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 20
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Appellant, the Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise (Jammu and Kashmir), Jammu, preferred an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appeal chal...

Union of India vs N. Jeetendra & Others: Telangana High Court Directs Conduct of DPC for Promotion of Executive Assistants to Inspector Post Within Four Months; Exercise Subject to Pending O.A. No. 1714 of 2020

Author
My Tax Expert
06/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 15
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe respondents were working as Executive Assistants in the Goods and Services Tax Department. Being aggrieved by the Department’s failure to conduct a Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) for pr...

Sandeep Kumar vs State of Haryana – Regular Bail Granted Under Section 439 CrPC in ₹59 Crore Money Circulation Scheme Case Due to Long Custody, Parity with Co-Accused and Delay in Trial

Author
My Tax Expert
06/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 17
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Sandeep Kumar, filed a second petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking regular bail in connection with FIR No. 578 dated 04.10.2018, registered at P...