Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
956,014
Growing community

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Godrej Consumer Products Limited vs Union of India & Others | J&K High Court Upholds Denial of GST Budgetary Support to Units Not Availing Excise Exemption Before 01.07.2017 | Sections 174 CGST Act, Section 5A Central Excise Act, Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 265 & 300A of Constitution

Author
My Tax Expert
02/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 28
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Godrej Consumer Products Limited, is a Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) manufacturer having manufacturing units situated at Kathua and Samba in the erstwhile State of Jammu & Kash...

Srinivasa Rao Kudupudi (Advocate for Petitioner) vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes & Anr. — High Court of Andhra Pradesh Condoned Delay in GST Appeal Under Section 107 & Remitted Cancellation Order Under Section 29(2) Due to Non-Constitution of GST Appellate Tribunal (Writ Petition No. 42201 of 2022)

Author
My Tax Expert
02/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 29
Read More »
Facts of the Case The 1st Respondent (Primary Authority) cancelled the GST registration of the petitioner via an order dated June 14, 2022, effective retrospectively from December 31, 2021. The ...

Hem Lata Gupta & Anr. Vs. Charanjeet Kumar Dutta & Anr. — Quashing of Criminal Cognizance Under Section 482 Cr.P.C Due to Incomplete Inquiry of Forgery Allegations Under Section 202 Cr.P.C

Author
My Tax Expert
02/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 27
Read More »
Facts of the Case Parties & Property: The petitioner No.1 is a tenant of a shop owned by respondent No.1. The dispute arose around a commercial premises situated at Rehari Colony, Jammu. The ...

M/s Godrej Consumer Products Limited Vs Union of India and Others: Denial of GST Budgetary Support to Units whose Central Excise Area-Based Exemption Expired Prior to July 1, 2017: High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh Affirming Strict Interpretation of Tax Notifications and Overriding Public Interest over Promissory Estoppel

Author
My Tax Expert
02/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 30
Read More »
Facts of the Case Corporate Profile & Infrastructure: The Petitioner, M/s Godrej Consumer Products Limited, is a Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) company manufacturing household insecticides, per...

Forged Rent Agreement for GST Registration: High Court Sets Aside Summoning Order for Want of Expert Opinion under Section 202 CrPC | Hem Lata Gupta & Anr. v. Charanjeet Kumar Dutta & Anr.

Author
My Tax Expert
01/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 70
Read More »
Case LawHem Lata Gupta & Anr. v. Charanjeet Kumar Dutta & Anr.Court: High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh at JammuCase No.: CRM(M) No. 278/2021, CrlM No. 517/2021Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod Chatter...

Godrej Consumer Products Limited v. Union of India & Others: Denial of GST Budgetary Support to Units Not Availing Excise Exemption Immediately Before 1st July 2017 — High Court of J&K and Ladakh Upholds Strict Interpretation of Eligibility Criteria

Author
My Tax Expert
24/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 192
Read More »
Godrej Consumer Products Limited v. Union of India & Others: Denial of GST Budgetary Support to Units Not Availing Excise Exemption Immediately Before 1st July 2017 — High Court of J&K and Ladakh Upholds Str...

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 vs. Electrical and Electronic India Ltd. — Section 69 (Unexplained Investment) | Protective vs Substantive Addition | No Substantial Question of Law

Author
My Tax Expert
06/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 316
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee allegedly made investments amounting to ₹4,05,00,000 in the JP Minda Group. The Assessing Officer made: Substantive addition in the hands of JP Minda Group. ...

P.R. Commissioner of Income Tax Central-02 vs B.L. Kashyap and Sons Ltd (Delhi High Court, 2023) – Section 142(2A), 142(2C) & 292B Analysis on Extension of Audit Time

Author
My Tax Expert
06/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 265
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present appeals were filed by the Revenue challenging a common order dated 30.09.2020 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) concerning Assessment Years 2004-05 to 2008-09. The core is...

M/s Boston Beverages Pvt. Ltd. vs M/s Kingston Beverages & Ors. & Anr. (2014) – Delhi High Court on Territorial Jurisdiction under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act

Author
My Tax Expert
01/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 388
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner company entered into an agreement with the respondent firm and advanced money. In discharge of liability, the respondents issued multiple post-dated cheques drawn on IDBI Bank, Hyderabad...

Lt. Col. Vijay Singh Sandhu vs Kingstar Entrepreneur Pvt. Ltd. | Section 11 Arbitration & Continuation of Interim Relief under Section 17 | Delhi High Court (2015)

Author
My Tax Expert
01/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 307
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, Lt. Col. Vijay Singh Sandhu, filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an Arbitrator. The matter was listed for hearing on 9...