Facts of the CaseThe petitioners, namely M/s Sun Flame Trading Pvt. Ltd.,
M/s Blue Star International Pvt. Ltd., and M/s Atlantic International Trading
Pvt. Ltd., approached the Delhi High Court challenging the provisi...
Facts of the Case
The
petitioner, M/s Ankush Auto Deals, filed a refund application on 20.07.2021.
The
refund amount totaling ₹25,29,944 was processed in two tranches:
₹14,22,482
...
Facts of the Case
The
respondent, Anand and Anand, is a law firm specializing in
intellectual property services and exporting legal services globally.
Around
75–80% of its revenue was derived fro...
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Aditya Narayan Ojha (Amit Associates),
challenged the non-compliance of an Order-in-Appeal dated 07.01.2022,
through which the appellate authority had revoked cancellation of GST
regis...
Facts of the Case
The
petitioner challenged a provisional attachment order dated 31.12.2019,
claiming it had lapsed and was no longer valid.
The
Revenue submitted that the attachment was not extend...
Facts of the CaseThe present appeals were filed by the Revenue against a common
order dated 01.08.2018 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate
Tribunal (CESTAT) in multiple service tax appeals. The resp...
Facts of the CaseThe present appeals were filed by the Revenue challenging a common
order dated 01.08.2018 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate
Tribunal (CESTAT) in multiple service tax appeals. The ...
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, Delhi International Airport Limited, sought a
refund of Service Tax amounting to ₹39,09,130/- which had been paid twice,
once through challan and again through utilization of CENVAT c...
Facts of the CaseThe present writ petition was filed challenging the order
dated 04.05.2022 whereby the GST registration of the petitioner, M/s Balaji
Enterprises, was cancelled by the Superintendent, Ward-66. The canc...
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner consortium’s GST registration was cancelled
pursuant to a show cause notice dated 08.07.2021. The notice failed to disclose
any specific reasons for the proposed action. Subsequently, ...