Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Showing filtered results. Clear filters
Retrospective GST Registration Cancellation Set Aside for Want of Prior Notice: Punjab and Haryana High Court Applies Oryx Fisheries Natural Justice Doctrine, Quashes Section 29 CGST Cancellation Order Against M/s Mahavir Metal Company in Mahavir Metal Company v. State of Haryana (CWP-31096-2025)
Facts of the CaseM/s Mahavir Metal Company's GST registration was cancelled retrospectively by order dated 01.09.2025 (Annexure P-4) purportedly under Section 29 of the CGST Act, 2017. The petitioner's grievance before t...
Karnataka High Court Restores Refund Appeal Rejected Solely for Non-Filing of Physical Copy Despite Timely Online Filing: Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition in Lenovo India vs Joint Commissioner of Central Tax Appeals (WP No.12683 of 2025)
Facts of the CaseM/s Lenovo India Pvt Ltd challenged an order dated 30.12.2024 passed by the Joint Commissioner of Central Tax (Appeals-1), Bengaluru, which rejected its appeal solely on the ground that a physical copy h...
Delhi High Court Relegates Fraudulent Input Tax Credit Noticee to Appellate Remedy in Rs.16 Crore Fake-Invoice Racket Involving 106 Noticees: Delhi High Court Disposes Writ Petition in Tech Plast vs Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax (W.P.(C) 11094/2025)
Facts of the CaseTech Plast, through its proprietor Deepmani Jain, challenged a show cause notice dated 05.08.2024 and the consequent order dated 08.02.2025 raising a demand of Rs.2,87,95,167, alleging fraudulent availme...
Merits Challenge to Section 73 Order Fails for Alternate Remedy but Appeal Window Granted: Calcutta High Court Disposes M/s Canara Bank vs Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, LTU (WPA 12726 of 2025)
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Canara Bank, challenged an order dated 28th February 2025 passed under Section 73 of the WBGST/CGST Act, 2017 for tax period 2020-21. A show-cause notice had been issued on 19th Novem...
Appeal Reserved for Orders Cannot Later Be Dismissed for Non-Prosecution: Punjab and Haryana High Court Sets Aside Section 107 Appellate Order and Remands GST Appeal of World Phone Internet Services Private Limited for Fresh Decision on Merits (CWP No.10053 of 2025)
Facts of the CaseWorld Phone Internet Services Private Limited's appeal filed under Section 107 of the CGST/HGST Act, 2017 before the Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Gurugram, was dismissed for non-prosecution by order dat...
Allahabad High Court Quashes Section 74 GST Order Where Notice Was Uploaded Under Additional Notices Tab Instead of View Notices Tab: Allahabad High Court Allows Writ Petition in Roshan Timber and Plywood vs State of U.P. (Writ Tax No.3439 of 2025)
Facts of the CaseM/s Roshan Timber and Plywood challenged an order dated 18.10.2022 passed by the Commercial Tax Officer, State Tax, Sector-3, Shamli, under Section 74 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, raising a d...
Orissa High Court Again Applies Mohanty Enterprises Formula to Condone Delay in Maa Durgabati Traders vs Superintendent, Dhenkanal (W.P.(C) No.30296 of 2025)
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Maa Durgabati Traders, Dhenkanal, had its GST registration cancelled by order dated 3rd February 2025, following a show-cause notice dated 6th November 2024. The petitioner approached the...
Bonafide GSTIN Error in GSTR-1 Held Rectifiable Beyond Statutory Deadline: Karnataka High Court Directs Tax Officers to Permit H.R. Carriers to Amend Its Returns and Correct Wrongly Entered Recipient GSTIN in M/s. H.R. Carriers v. State of Karnataka (WP No. 22477 of 2024)
Facts of the CaseM/s. H.R. Carriers, a transporter and registered taxpayer operating under the bill-to-ship-to model, approached the Karnataka High Court after inadvertently entering the GSTIN of Respondent No.5 (a Keral...
Allahabad High Court Quashes a Time-Barred Section 73 GST Order After Finding the Show Cause Notice Left the Personal Hearing Field Marked 'NA' Instead of Fixing an Actual Date, in M/s Krishna Kirana and General Store vs State of U.P. (WRIT TAX No. 822 of 2025)
Facts of the CaseM/s Krishna Kirana and General Store, through its proprietor, challenged an order dated 08.04.2023 passed under Section 73 of the GST Act and the subsequent order dated 29.03.2025 dismissing its appeal a...
Misclassification of Goods Cannot Justify Section 129(3) UPGST Penalty: Allahabad High Court Quashes Detention Order and Orders Refund in M/S Tirupati Agro Commodities vs State of U.P. (Writ Tax No. 2596 of 2025)
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/S Tirupati Agro Commodities, was aggrieved by an order dated 08.05.2025 passed by the second respondent imposing penalty under Section 129(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax...