Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,857,623
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-6 vs National Fertilizers Ltd. (Delhi High Court) – Validity of Slow-Moving Stock Valuation under Section 145 & Section 145A of the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
07/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 317
Read More »
Facts of the CaseNational Fertilizers Ltd., a public sector undertaking engaged in manufacturing and distribution of fertilizers, maintained inventory including stores and spare parts. During the financial year relevan...

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-6 vs National Fertilizers Ltd. | Delhi High Court Upholds Valuation of Slow-Moving and Obsolete Inventory under Section 145 & Section 145A of the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
07/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 308
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe respondent-assessee, National Fertilizers Ltd., a public sector undertaking engaged in manufacturing and distribution of fertilizers, maintained substantial inventory including stores and spare pa...

Delhi High Court | Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) read with Explanation 5 | Scope of Return Filed under Section 153A vis-à-vis Original Return under Section 139(1)

Author
My Tax Expert
07/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 293
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessees had originally filed their returns under Section 139(1) declaring certain income for Assessment Years 2005-06 and 2006-07.Subsequently, a search and seizure operation under Section 132 w...

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-4 vs Gulbarga Associates (P) Ltd. | Delhi High Court on Section 68 of Income Tax Act | Addition on Share Capital and Burden of Proof

Author
My Tax Expert
07/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 297
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue preferred appeals against the assessee, Gulbarga Associates (P) Limited, challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal wherein additions made by the Assessing Officer under S...

Delhi High Court on Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) read with Explanation 5 and Section 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 – Whether Additional Income Declared in Return Filed Pursuant to Search Automatically Attracts

Author
My Tax Expert
07/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 291
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed four appeals under Section 260A challenging separate orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) concerning penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. ...

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-19 vs. Shri Neeraj Jindal & Ankur Aggarwal (Delhi High Court) – Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) on Income Declared in Section 153A Return | Scope of Explanation 5 in Search Assessments

Author
My Tax Expert
07/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 309
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessees originally filed returns under Section 139(1) declaring lower income for AYs 2005–06 and 2006–07. Subsequently, a search and seizure operation under Section 132 was conducted on the...

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-3 vs Suncity Projects Pvt. Ltd. | Delay Condonation Rejected for Failure to Explain 86 Days’ Delay under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
07/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 338
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Income Tax Department filed multiple appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 21.03.2016. The appeals were filed with a del...

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-3 vs Suncity Projects Pvt. Ltd. | Delay Condonation Rejected for Failure to Explain Each Day’s Delay | Delhi High Court | Section 260A Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
07/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 337
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe Income Tax Department filed multiple appeals before the Delhi High Court against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 21.03.2016. However, there was a delay of 86 days in fi...

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-19 vs Shri Neeraj Jindal & Anr. | Delhi High Court | Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on Income Declared in Return filed u/s 153A – Whether Mere Disclosure After Search Amounts to Concealment?

Author
My Tax Expert
07/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 315
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessees had originally filed their returns under Section 139(1) declaring lower income for AY 2005-06 and AY 2006-07.A search operation under Section 132 was conducted in the JM Estate Developers...

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central-3) vs Suncity Projects Pvt. Ltd. | Delay Condonation Rejected for Failure to Explain 86 Days Delay | Delhi High Court | Section 260A of the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
07/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 297
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed multiple appeals against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 21.03.2016. However, there was a delay of 86 days in filing the appeals before the Delhi High Court.Appl...