Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Micro Systems and Services,
a sole proprietorship engaged in assembling and supplying computers and
computer parts, supplied goods to Defence Research & Development
Organisation (...
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioners challenged the detention orders
dated 26.04.2022 passed by the District Magistrate, Surat, under the Prevention
of Black Marketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities ...
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Sanjay Agencies, approached
the Jharkhand High Court seeking a direction to the GST authorities to
permit the filing of Form GST TRAN-1 for carrying forward eligible
transitional inpu...
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, R.P.M. Medicare, approached
the Jharkhand High Court seeking a direction to the GST authorities to permit
filing of Form GST TRAN-1 for carrying forward eligible transitional
input tax...
Facts of the CaseThe appellants, M/s JUD Cement Ltd. and another,
filed an application before the Gauhati High Court under Order XLI Rule 5 read
with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking a stay of the jud...
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s S. Square Cargo Movers Pvt.
Ltd., challenged the rejection of its technical bid submitted pursuant to a
Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) issued by South Eastern Coalfields Limited
(SEC...
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Indwell Constructions Private
Limited, challenged the Show Cause Notice dated 05.04.2021 and sought the
benefit of transitional Input Tax Credit that could not be effectively carrie...
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Citykart Retail Pvt. Ltd.,
is engaged in the business of trading ready-made garments and is duly
registered under the Uttar Pradesh GST as well as the VAT Act, 2008. The
company tr...
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioners, comprising retired employees of
various nationalised banks, challenged the higher health insurance premiums
imposed upon them under the optional Medical Insurance Scheme introduced
p...
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Namshad A, a contractor,
claimed that he was entitled to GST reimbursement amounting to
₹2,00,41,264/- from the Government. According to the petitioner, despite
submitting a represe...