Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Telangana High Court Relegates GST Penalty Appeal to GST Appellate Tribunal Under Amended Section 112(8) Proviso on 10% Penalty Pre-Deposit, Grants Interim Protection — S. Ashok Kumar (M/s Annai Infra Developers Ltd.) vs Commissioner of Customs and Central Tax (WRIT PETITION NO. 32614 OF 2025)
Facts of the Case
S. Ashok Kumar, Managing Director of M/s. Annai Infra Developers Limited, challenged an order-in-appeal dated 30.09.2025 by which the appellate authority had refused to interfere with an order-in-origi...
Madurai Bench Quashes Section 74 GST Assessment on Arulmigu Ramanathaswamy Temple Despite Repeated Non-Appearance, Considering Public Charitable Interest — Joint Commissioner/Executive Officer vs State Tax Officer (Intelligence Wing) (W.P.(MD)No.34563 of 2025)
Facts of the Case
The Joint Commissioner/Executive Officer of Arulmigu Ramanathaswamy Temple, Rameswaram (GSTIN 332400002493TMP), challenged an assessment order dated 10.07.2025 passed under Section 74 of the TNGST Act,...
Madurai Bench Quashes GST Appeal Rejection for Marginal Delay, Directs Appellate Authority to Number and Decide Appeal on Merits — M/s Butyful Products and Services Pvt. Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner (ST) (W.P(MD)No.28020 of 2025)
Facts of the Case
M/s Butyful Products and Services Private Ltd. (GSTIN 33AACCB5134B1ZF) filed an appeal against an assessment order dated 25.01.2025 (Ref. No. ZD330125230635R) passed under Section 73 of the TNGST Act, ...
Allahabad High Court Holds Ex-Parte Section 73 Order Passed Without Notice of Hearing Date is Non Est in Law, Quashes Demand and Appeal Dismissal — Gangotri Engineers vs State of U.P. (WRIT TAX No. 1175 of 2025)
Facts of the Case
Gangotri Engineers, through its proprietor Rajeev Pandey, challenged an ex-parte order passed under Section 73 of the GST Act, 2017 in Form GST DRC-07 dated 15.02.2025 for FY 2020-21, raising a demand ...
Madurai Bench Quashes Section 129 GST Penalty for Typographical Error in E-Way Bill Place of Dispatch, Applies De Minimis Principle Under Section 126 — M/s Century Apparels Pvt. Ltd. vs Deputy State Tax Officer (W.P.(MD)NO.3748 OF 2025)
Facts of the Case
M/s Century Apparels Private Ltd., a garment manufacturer with its manufacturing unit in Tirupur, moved goods from Tirupur to Tuticorin for export to Ireland on 01.09.2024. The vehicle was detained and...
Gauhati High Court Holds Summary in GST DRC-01 Cannot Substitute a Proper Show Cause Notice Under Section 73, Quashes Order for Want of Authentication and Hearing — Diganta Kumar Deka vs State of Assam (WP(C)/5937/2025)
Facts of the Case
Diganta Kumar Deka was issued a Summary of Show Cause Notice dated 27.09.2023 in Form GST DRC-01 for the tax period July 2017 to March 2018, along with an attachment determining the tax. The petitioner...
Uttarakhand High Court Permits GST Registration Revocation Application Within Two Weeks Subject to Filing Pending Returns and Depositing Dues, Applying Earlier Batch Order — Quality Communication and General Order vs Commissioner, State GST (WRIT PETITION (M/B) NO. 1039 OF 2025)
Facts of the Case
Quality Communication and General Order, a taxable person registered under the GST Act, had its registration cancelled by the competent GST authority on account of failure to furnish GST returns for th...
Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds GST Registration Cancellation Under Section 29, Holds Personal Hearing Was in Fact Afforded Despite Unintimated Change of Business Address — DNC Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs Superintendent of Central Tax (WRIT PETITION NO. 23025/2024)
Facts of the Case
DNC Infrastructure Private Limited challenged the cancellation of its GST registration by an order dated 13.09.2024, cancelling it with effect from an inspection dated 23.08.2024, on the ground that it...
Allahabad High Court Quashes Section 73 GST Order for Denial of Personal Hearing Despite Section 75(4) Mandate — M/s Sanjay Traders (Pratap Tripathi) vs Addl. Commissioner Grade II Ayodhya (WRIT TAX No. 1210 of 2025)
Facts of the Case
M/s Sanjay Traders, through its proprietor Devendra Pratap Tripathi, challenged an order dated 25.04.2024 passed under Section 73 of the U.P. GST Act, 2017, as well as the order dated 09.10.2025 dismis...
Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte GST Adjudication Order on Cost, Grants Fresh Opportunity to Reply to Show Cause Notice — M/s Metropolis Fair Oaks vs Superintendent of Central Tax (WP No. 28679 of 2025)
Facts of the Case
M/s Metropolis Fair Oaks, a partnership firm, challenged an ex-parte adjudication order dated 27.06.2024 (Order-in-Original No. 02/2024-25/CED-9) passed by the Superintendent of Central Tax. Pursuant t...