Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,886,004
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Ex-Parte Assessment under Sections 144 and 143(3): ITAT Allahabad Grants One Final Opportunity in Anil Kumar Singh vs ITO, Sultanpur (AY 2016-17)

Author
My Tax Expert
09/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 521
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2016-17 declaring a total income of ₹1,94,200. The case was selected for scrutiny under CASS. During the course of assessment proceedings,...

Penalty under Section 271B Not Leviable Where No Books Are Maintained: ITAT Allahabad Deletes Penalty in Anita Mehrotra vs CIT(A), NFAC (AY 2018-19)

Author
My Tax Expert
09/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 550
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, an individual engaged in wholesale trading of tea, did not file her return of income within the prescribed time for Assessment Year 2018-19. Subsequently, during assessment proceedings, ...

ITAT Allahabad Sets Aside Ex-Parte Penalty Order Under Section 271B for Violation of Natural Justice: Ganga Prasad Kesarwani vs ITO (AY 2017-18)

Author
My Tax Expert
09/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 422
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee had not filed his return of income for the relevant assessment year. In response to notice issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, the assessee e-filed his return on 24.05.2021 de...

ITAT Allahabad Sets Aside Non-Speaking Ex-Parte Appellate Order in Section 69A Addition Case: Chhedi Lal Gupta vs ITO (AY 2017-18)

Author
My Tax Expert
09/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 525
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee is an individual engaged in business activity. For the Assessment Year 2017-18, the assessee did not file a return of income. The Assessing Officer completed the assessment on 24.12.2019 a...

ITAT Allahabad Restores Section 68 Addition Matter to CIT(A) Due to Ex-Parte Order: Ankit Gupta vs DCIT (AY 2017-18) | Reliance on CIT v. SAS Educational Society

Author
My Tax Expert
09/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 437
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, an individual, is engaged in the business of two-wheeler dealership and authorized workshop of Honda Motor & Scooter India Ltd. under the name and style of M/s Shree Grand Auto. The ...

Ex-Parte and Non-Speaking Appellate Order Violative of Section 250(6): ITAT Allahabad Sets Aside CIT(A) Order Passed Under Faceless Regime – Ram Lakhan Maurya vs Assessment Unit (AY 2015-16)

Author
My Tax Expert
09/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 552
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, an individual, filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2015-16 declaring total income of ₹2,41,890. The Assessing Officer completed the assessment under section 147 read with se...

Appeal Dismissed In Limine for Non-Removal of Procedural Defects: ITAT Allahabad Declines to Enter Merits but Grants Liberty for Restoration – Pooja Pal vs ITO (AY 2010-11)

Author
My Tax Expert
09/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 487
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, for Assessment Year 2010-11 against the appellate order dated 21.03.2025 passed by the Commissioner of Income Ta...

Non-Speaking Ex-Parte Appellate Order Violates Section 250(6): ITAT Allahabad Sets Aside CIT(A) Order and Restores Matter for De Novo Adjudication – Mohammad Zaki vs ITO (AY 2011-12)

Author
My Tax Expert
09/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 555
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, an individual, filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2011-12 declaring total income of ₹4,63,420. The Assessing Officer completed the assessment under sections 147 read with 1...

Trade Dress Protection in India under the Trade Marks Act, 1999: Evolving Judicial Dimensions, Passing Off Actions & Key Case Laws (ITC v Britannia, Pernod Ricard, Zydus v Cipla, Colgate v Anchor)

Author
Anurag Singhal, Advocate
05/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 1328
Read More »
TRADE MARK - Evolving Dimensions of Trade Dress Protection in India-In today’s competitive, visually driven marketplace, consumers identify products by their overall visual identity such as colours, shapes, packagin...

Branding by Sound: A Comparative Study of Sound Trademark Protection in India, EU, and the USA- Statutory Framework in India

Author
Anurag Singhal, Advocate
05/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 1098
Read More »
Branding by Sound: A Comparative Study of Sound Trademark Protection in India, EU, and the USA- Statutory Framework in India The Trade Marks Act, 1999 does not explicitly define a sound trademark. However, Sectio...