Facts of the CaseThe Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu, filed Central Excise Appeal No. 67 of 2023 before the Jammu & Kashmir High Court against M/s JSB Aluminium.As in several other appeals filed by ...
Facts of the CaseApurve Goel and Priyanka Goel, former directors of a company originally called Sharaji Duplex Board Limited (later AAA Paper Marketing Limited, then AAA Paper Limited), challenged Look Out Circulars (LOC...
Facts of the CaseM/s Scan Energy and Power Ltd filed WP No. 20815 of 2023 before the Telangana High Court challenging a summons dated 01.08.2023 issued by the Central Tax (Rangareddy GST Commissionerate) to the company a...
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner had been awarded a contract for works under the 'Neeru-Chettu' scheme in Vizianagaram District. After execution of the contract, a final bill of Rs. 7,41,085 was prepared as per sanctioned...
Facts of the CaseM/s Linde India Limited, a manufacturer of industrial and rare gases registered under the Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003 and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, had for years classified and sold its ga...
Facts of the CaseShahbaz Alam sought bail in a case arising from an FIR alleging that co-accused Nikhat Bano, wife of MLA Abbas Ansari (lodged in Chitrakoot Jail), was found spending hours with her husband in a room outs...
Facts of the CaseM/s Vishnupriya Constructions was assessed to service tax by a best-judgment order dated 03.03.2022, passed under Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994, read with Rule 142, in proceedings before the Commis...
Facts of the CaseM/s Venkateswara Traders challenged an order dated 18.03.2023 passed by the Deputy Assistant Commissioner (ST)-1 under Section 73 of the CGST/SGST Act, 2017, in Form GST DRC-07, raising a tax and penalty...
Facts of the CaseThis batch of criminal miscellaneous cases before the Kerala High Court arose out of several complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, filed by South Indian Bank Ltd. against ...
Facts of the CaseThis writ petition before the Kerala High Court did not concern any dispute under GST law, even though the State GST Department was formally arrayed as the 4th respondent. The petitioner, Vyshakan K., a ...