Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Sahil Gupta vs State of Punjab: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Regular Bail Under Sections 22, 25 and 29 of NDPS Act; Section 37 Rigour Relaxed for First-Time Offender Named Only in Co-Accused’s Disclosure Statement Without Recovery
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Sahil Gupta, approached the High
Court of Punjab and Haryana seeking regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in
connection with FIR No. 116 dated 04.06.2022, registered under Sections 2...
Gemar Lollen & Anr. vs State of Arunachal Pradesh & Ors. — Gauhati High Court Permits Representation Under Section 80 of SGST Act for Instalment Payment of GST Interest Demanded Under Section 73
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioners, Gemar Lollen and M/s M. L.
Enterprise, approached the Gauhati High Court by filing a writ petition seeking
setting aside of the notice dated 12 September 2022 issued by the
Superinte...
Tvl. G. Sankar Timber Depot vs State Tax Officer (Adjudication), Intelligence Wing – Madras High Court | Section 79 of the CGST Act – Attachment of Property under Form GST DRC-16 after Remand
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner challenged the recovery proceedings initiated
by the respondent through Form GST DRC-16 dated 20.11.2021, whereby the
petitioner's immovable properties were attached for recovery o...
Gauhati University vs Union of India & Ors.: Gauhati High Court Allows Impleadment of UGC as Necessary Party in Finance Act, 1994 Demand and Penalty Dispute
Facts of the
CaseGauhati University, a State University established
under the Gauhati University Act, 1947, had instituted the connected writ
petition, being WP(C) No. 5055 of 2022.The subject matter of the writ petit...
Land Acquisition Officer, SRSP, Special Deputy Collector vs Bukya Janu & Others — Telangana High Court Reduces Market Value from ₹75,000 to ₹70,000 per Acre under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Facts of the
CaseThe dispute arose from acquisition of lands
belonging to the respondents-claimants, measuring approximately Ac.18.37½
guntas, situated at Singaram, Munagaveedu and Guindemrajupally Villages,
Mahabub...
Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise (J&K) Jammu vs SDS Ramcides Crop Science Pvt. Ltd. — Excise Appeal Dismissed as Issue Squarely Covered by CEA No. 10/2020 and Connected Appeals
Facts of the
Case
The Commissioner
of Central GST & Central Excise (J&K) Jammu preferred CEA No. 304/2022
before the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh at Jammu against SDS
Ramcides Crop Science Pv...
Qudsia Sarwari Razvi vs State of Telangana & Others – Telangana High Court Directs Registration of Sale Deed Without Reference to Memo G2/257/2019 | Article 226 of Constitution of India | W.P. No. 19885 of 2022
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner approached the Telangana High Court under
Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a writ of mandamus against the action
of the Sub-Registrar in refusing to receive, register, and r...
Gurmukh Singh vs Union of India & Commissioner, Central GST – Rajasthan High Court Directs Decision on Pending Representation Within One Month Under Article 226
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Gurmukh Singh, Director of
M/s Amar Pratap Steels Pvt. Ltd., filed a civil writ petition before the
Rajasthan High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.The petitioner h...
M/s. Paras Krushi Kendra vs Union of India & Others – Bombay High Court Allows Correction of GST TRAN-1 & Filing of TRAN-2 | Section 140 CGST Act & Rules 117(1), 120A CGST Rules
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s. Paras Krushi Kendra, filed a writ
petition before the Bombay High Court seeking permission to revise Form GST
TRAN-1 electronically and to upload the revised form under Rule 120A o...
M/s. Bhanjadeo Constructions vs State of Odisha & Others – Orissa High Court | Reimbursement of Differential GST on Pre-GST Works Contracts | Works Contract | GST Transition | W.P.(C) No. 38502 of 2021
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s. Bhanjadeo Constructions,
challenged the action of the State Government authorities for not reimbursing
the differential tax burden that arose due to the transition from the VAT
re...