Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Notice and Demand Order Uploaded on 'Additional Notices Tab', Follows Ola Fleet Technologies – M/S Maa Kaila Metal Works vs Union of India (Writ Tax No. 3891 of 2025)
Facts of the Case
M/S Maa Kaila Metal Works challenged an order dated 10 January 2024 and the underlying show cause notice dated 12 September 2023, passed under Section 73 of the GST Act, 2017 by the Deputy Commissioner...
Madras High Court Quashes GST Order After Full Tax Already Recovered from Bank Account, Treats Order as Addendum to Show Cause Notice for Fresh Reply – Tvl. Pio Agencies vs Deputy State Tax Officer-2, Nagercoil (W.P.(MD) No. 21235 of 2025)
Facts of the Case
Tvl. Pio Agencies challenged an order dated 29 January 2025, preceded by a notice in DRC-01 dated 17 October 2024, after its statutory appeal against the order was dismissed by the Deputy Commissioner ...
Madras High Court Directs Refund of GST Paid on Ocean Freight Following Mohit Minerals, Applies Petitioner's Own Earlier Batch Order – Viterra India Private Limited vs Union of India (W.P.(MD) No. 23255 of 2025)
Facts of the Case
Viterra India Private Limited challenged an Order-in-Appeal dated 3 December 2021 and a rectification order dated 28 June 2022, both rejecting its refund claim of Rs.2,52,079/- with interest, relating ...
Karnataka High Court Holds Notice Cannot Be Served by E-Mail Alone Once GST Registration Is Cancelled, Sets Aside Section 73 Adjudication Order – M/S I Interior vs Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (WP No. 12874 of 2025)
Facts of the Case
M/S I Interior, a proprietary concern, challenged an adjudication order dated 20 July 2024 passed under Section 73(9) of the CGST/SGST Act read with Rules 100(1), 100(2), 100(3) and 142(5) of the KGST ...
Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Single Composite GST Assessment Order Spanning Five Financial Years as Impermissible, Following Division Bench Precedent – Neelimarla Jute Mills Company Limited vs State of A.P. (Writ Petition No. 10094/2025)
Facts of the Case
Neelimarla Jute Mills Company Limited was served with a single assessment order dated 9 February 2024 in Form GST DRC-07, covering the entire period from 2017-2018 to 2021-2022, preceded by show cause ...
Delhi High Court Remands GST Order Against Small Dry-Fruits Seller Passed Without Reply or Hearing, Keeps Section 168A Notification Challenge Open – MAM Raj Hari Ram vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi (W.P.(C) 16718/2025)
Facts of the Case
MAM Raj Hari Ram, described as a small seller engaged in the sale of dry fruits, challenged an order dated 21 August 2024 raising a demand of Rs.5,64,190/- for the financial year 2019-20, and the under...
Karnataka High Court Orders Refund of Rs.3.11 Crore Recovered During Search Under Section 74(5), Holds Payment Made Without Prior Demand or DRC-04 Acknowledgment Was Involuntary – M/S KUM Internationals vs Assistant Commissioner (HPU), CGST Mysore (WP No. 26885 of 2024)
Facts of the Case
M/S KUM Internationals, an exporter of granite slabs, monuments and memorials, had Rs.2,20,40,580/- and, four days later, a further Rs.91,31,774/- collected from it by CGST officers during search, insp...
Karnataka High Court Holds Solar Inverters Supplied as Part of Solar Power Generating System Qualify for 5% Concessional GST, Not 18% as General Electrical Devices – ABB India Limited vs Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (WP No. 9686 of 2025 & connected matters)
Facts of the Case
ABB India Limited, engaged in the manufacture and sale of switchgear, industrial electronic controllers, drives and related electrical goods, supplied solar inverters classifiable under Chapter 85 of t...
Allahabad High Court Quashes Section 73 GST Order for Denial of Personal Hearing, Applying Mahaveer Trading Company Precedent — M/S Shubham Agencies vs State of U.P. (Writ Tax No. 1517 of 2025)
Facts of the Case
M/S Shubham Agencies, through its proprietor Amit Srivastava, challenged an order dated 26.07.2024 passed under Section 73 of the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and the subsequent order dated 2...
Andhra Pradesh High Court Directs Revocation Process for GST Registration Cancelled for Non-Filing of Returns, Following Its Own Precedent — Vijaya Durga Engineering Works vs Additional Commissioner (ST) (W.P. No. 33439 of 2025)
Facts of the Case
Vijaya Durga Engineering Works, a proprietorship represented by Pandu Suddula, had its GST registration cancelled by an order dated 30.07.2024 bearing Reference No. ZA370724044212R, issued without a Do...