Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Delhi High Court Leaves Rs.39.82 Crore Composite-vs-Mixed-Supply GST Demand on Diagnostic Reagents to Appellate Authority, Relegates Ortho Clinical Diagnostics to Statutory Appeal Under Section 107 -- Ortho Clinical Diagnostics India Pvt Ltd vs Union of India (W.P.(C) 15083/2025)
Facts of the Case
The petitioner manufactures and supplies reagents, consumables and calibrators used in diagnostic testing, supplying reagents to hospitals and laboratories, at times bundled with laboratory equipment...
Allahabad High Court Quashes Non-Reasoned Ex-Parte GST Registration Cancellation Under Section 29(2), Holds Discretion Cannot Be Exercised Mechanically – M/S Sai Trades vs State of U.P. (Writ Tax No. 1160 of 2025)
Facts of the Case
M/S Sai Trades, Bikapur, Faizabad challenged an order dated 20 April 2022 cancelling its GST registration under Section 29(2)(d) of the GST Act, as well as the appellate order dated 27 September 2025 d...
Allahabad High Court Quashes Section 74 GST Order Where Notice Marked 'NA' Against Personal Hearing Date, Time and Venue – Mustafasons Heritage Pvt. Ltd. vs Addl. Commissioner Grade-II (Appeal) (Writ Tax No. 988 of 2025)
Facts of the Case
Mustafasons Heritage Pvt. Ltd. challenged an order dated 7 July 2022 passed under Section 74 of the GST Act and the order dated 2 September 2025 dismissing its appeal as beyond limitation. The petition...
Delhi High Court Declines Writ Jurisdiction in Rs.122 Crore Fake-ITC Racket Involving 1155 Recipients, Relegates Recipient to Statutory Appeal – VSA Trading Pvt Ltd vs Principal Commissioner CGST (W.P.(C) 18128/2025)
Facts of the Case
VSA Trading Pvt Ltd challenged an Order-in-Original dated 21 January 2025 raising a demand of Rs.34,47,419/- against it, arising out of a large-scale investigation into fraudulent availment of Input Ta...
Andhra Pradesh High Court Holds Missing DIN Renders GST Assessment Orders 'Invalid', Not 'Void', and Dismisses Batch of Eight Writ Petitions on Ground of Laches – Veera Mohana Krishna Engineering Works vs Assistant Commissioner (W.P. No. 17606 of 2025 & batch)
Facts of the Case
A batch of eight writ petitions – seven filed by Veera Mohana Krishna Engineering Works and one by S. Ravindra Reddy Contractor – challenged best-judgment assessment orders passed under Section 62 ...
Madras High Court Remands Section 74 Penalty for Fresh Consideration After Assessee Withdrew and Re-Filed Appeal on Wrong Advice to Avail Amnesty Scheme – M/s Saroj Associates vs Assistant Commissioner (ST), Kumbakonam (W.P.(MD) No. 17181 of 2025)
Facts of the Case
M/s Saroj Associates, a proprietary concern, suffered an assessment order dated 20 March 2024 under Section 74 of the TNGST Act, 2017. It discharged the tax liability on 1 April 2024 and interest on 4 ...
Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Order Where Notice Date and Personal Hearing Date Coincided, Follows Mahaveer Trading Company – M/S Raj Pharmaceuticals vs State of U.P. (Writ Tax No. 1207 of 2025)
Facts of the Case
M/S Raj Pharmaceuticals challenged an order dated 31 December 2023 passed under Section 73 of the UPGST Act, 2017, and the appellate order dated 20 January 2025 dismissing its appeal as beyond limitati...
Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Section 73 GST Demand for Notices Uploaded on 'Additional Notices' Tab, Directs Fresh 15-Day Notice – M/S Kanpur Industrial Corporation vs State of U.P. (Writ Tax No. 3153 of 2025)
Facts of the Case
M/S Kanpur Industrial Corporation challenged an order dated 30 December 2023 passed under Section 73 of the GST Act, 2017 by the Deputy Commissioner, Sector 8, State GST, Kanpur, creating a demand agai...
Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Order Passed With Personal Hearing Date Preceding Reply Date, Cites Commissioner's Own Office Memo on Section 75(4) Lapses – M/S Kandarp Construction India Pvt. Ltd. vs State of U.P. (Writ Tax No. 1379 of 2025)
Facts of the Case
M/S Kandarp Construction India Pvt. Ltd. challenged an order dated 28 August 2024 passed under Section 73 of the UP GST Act, 2017, as well as the order dated 30 October 2025 dismissing its appeal as be...
Madras High Court Quashes Ex-Parte GST Assessment on Condition of 25% Pre-Deposit, Grants Fresh Opportunity of Personal Hearing – C. Balasubramanian vs State Tax Officer, Tirunelveli (W.P(MD)No.32575 of 2025)
Facts of the Case
The petitioner, a contractor registered under GSTIN 33ACDPB1805H1ZD, challenged an ex-parte assessment order dated 21 August 2024 for the tax period 2019-2020 and the consequential summary order in For...