Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,239,357
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Detailed analysis of Commissioner of Income Tax, Central I, New Delhi vs J B Roy (ITA 546/2010) before the Delhi High Court, covering facts, issues, arguments, and court findings under Sections 143(3) & 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Learn about reassessment procedures, relevant case law, and principles protecting assessee rights in tax disputes.

Author
My Tax Expert
27/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 115
Read More »
Facts of the Case: The appellant, Commissioner of Income Tax, Central I, New Delhi, filed an appeal against the respondent, J B Roy, challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The dispute arose regard...

Jurisdictional Validity of Settlement Applications Post Expiry of Statutory Assessment Time Limits: Delhi High Court’s Definitive Ruling on "Pending Proceedings" under Section 245A(b) and Section 245C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Income Tax Settlement Commission

Author
My Tax Expert
27/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 155
Read More »
Facts of the Case: The assessee filed returns for four assessment years: 2004-05, 2005-06, 2007-08, and 2008-09. The statutory period for completing assessments under Sections 143/144 had expired for all...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Central I, New Delhi vs J B Roy – Delhi High Court ITA 546/2010 | Section 143(3) & 147 Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
27/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 126
Read More »
Facts of the Case: The appellant, Commissioner of Income Tax, Central I, New Delhi, filed an appeal against the respondent, J B Roy, challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The dispute arose regard...

Commissioner of Income Tax-I vs Convertech Equipments Pvt. Ltd. | Delhi High Court | Section 36(1)(ii), 147 | Assessment Years 2002-03 & 2003-04

Author
My Tax Expert
27/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 127
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe respondent, Convertech Equipments Pvt. Ltd., filed its income tax returns for the assessment years 2002-03 and 2003-04. During scrutiny, the assessing officer disallowed commissions totaling ₹2...

Distinction Between Penal Interest and Compensatory Business Expenditure: Delhi High Court Clarifies the Applicability of Section 37(1) and Section 43B(e) in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Enchante Jewellery Ltd

Author
My Tax Expert
27/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 131
Read More »
 Facts of the Case The assessee, Enchante Jewellery Ltd, engaged in manufacturing and trading gold jewellery, imported machinery under the EPCG Scheme at concessional duty rates with an export obligat...

Commissioner of Income Tax-I vs Convertech Equipments Pvt. Ltd. | Delhi High Court | Section 36(1)(ii), Reassessment Jurisdiction

Author
My Tax Expert
27/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 132
Read More »
Facts of the Case: The respondent, Convertech Equipments Pvt. Ltd., filed income tax returns for the assessment years 2002-03 and 2003-04. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed commission payments of 29,42,534/- and 2...

Assessment of Undisclosed Income and the Scope of Rectifying Apparent Mistakes: Delhi High Court’s Landmark Ruling in T.C. Sood vs. Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 158BC and Section 254(2)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 151
Read More »
Facts of the Case:The petitioner, T.C. Sood, a resident of New Delhi, was subject to a search under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on 13th May 2003. Following the search, a notice under Section 158BC was is...

R.C. Goel vs Commissioner of Income Tax: Disallowance of Cash Payments under Section 40A(3) – Applicability of Rule 6DD(k)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 146
Read More »
 Facts of the Case: The appellant, R.C. Goel, is a mobile railway catering contractor operating on trains (Punjab Mail & Pushpak Express) and running two hotels. During AY 2008-09, purchases worth Rs. 27,48,8...

Meinhardt Singapore Pte Ltd. vs Assistant Director of Income Tax, Circle 3(1), International Taxation, New Delhi – Section 44D & 115A Dispute on Technical Services Income

Author
My Tax Expert
27/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 139
Read More »
 Facts of the Case The petitioner, a Singapore-based company with a branch in India, provided technical consultancy services to NHAI under a contract dated 30th January 2001. The petitioner subcontr...

The Commissioner of Income Tax vs Sain Processing and Weaving Mills P. Ltd.: Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act, 1961 – Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
27/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 152
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Sain Processing and Weaving Mills P. Ltd., filed its income tax return for the assessment year 2000-01 declaring nil total income, which was processed under Section 143(1)(a) of the Inc...