Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,239,048
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Ester Industries Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax – Delhi High Court Clarifies Bar on Raising Fresh MAT Computation Challenges at Appellate Stage under Sections 115JA and 115JAA of the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
26/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 147
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Ester Industries Ltd., filed its return of income for Assessment Year 1997–98 declaring nil taxable income under the normal provisions of the Income Tax Act. The assessee did not comput...

Ester Industries Limited vs Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi-IV | Whether MAT under Section 115JA Can Be Imposed Through Prima Facie Adjustment under Section 143(1)(a) – Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
26/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 146
Read More »
FACTS OF THE CASE The assessee company filed its return for Assessment Year 1998–99 declaring "Nil" income and specifically stated that provisions of Section 115JA relating to MAT were not applicable. ...

Delhi HC in CIT vs. Kuldeep Sood: Rule of Consistency Prevails; No Block Assessment Addition u/s 158BC for Income Already Declared u/s 139(1) by Spouse

Author
My Tax Expert
26/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 133
Read More »
Facts of the Case:1.      1.      The Search Action: A search and seizure operation was conducted by the Income Tax Department on both the business and residential premis...

Commissioner of Income Tax-XVI vs Yoshio Kubo & Connected Matters – Taxability of Employer-Borne Taxes, Social Security Contributions, Hypothetical Tax and Non-Monetary Perquisites under Sections 10(10CC), 17(2) & 195A of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
26/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 144
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appeals involved expatriate employees working in India whose employers implemented tax equalization arrangements. Under these arrangements, employers assumed the actual Indian tax burden while ded...

Delhi HC in Maruti Suzuki: Coercive Recovery Barred; ITAT Cannot Ignore Prima Facie Case While Granting Stay of Demand u/s 220(6)

Author
My Tax Expert
26/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 145
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe writ petition challenged the order dated 11.01.2013 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Stay No. 310/Del/2012 related to assessment year 2008-09. The petitioner sought a stay on...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Mr. Fumio Goto | Delhi High Court on Taxability of Salary Income of Expatriate Employees and Relief under Section 10(10CC) of the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
26/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 148
Read More »
Facts of the Case The respondents were expatriate employees employed in India by their respective employers. Under employment arrangements, the employers had undertaken liability to bear the employees’...

Commissioner of Income Tax-XIV vs. Mr. Duncan Etherington | Taxability of Salary Income of Foreign Employees and Interpretation of Tax Exemption Provisions under the Income Tax Act – Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
26/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 131
Read More »
Facts of the Case The present appeal formed part of a group of connected appeals filed by the Income Tax Department. The dispute involved foreign/expatriate employees and the taxability of employment-rel...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Bhushan Capital and Credit Services Ltd – Reassessment Jurisdiction under Section 147 & Short-Term Capital Gains (Assessment Year 1999-2000)

Author
My Tax Expert
26/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 135
Read More »
Facts of the Case Bhushan Capital and Credit Services Ltd filed its income tax return for AY 1999-2000, declaring Rs. 5,10,130 as short-term capital gains. The Assessment Officer (AO) initially processed the r...

Commissioner of Income Tax-XVI vs. Sh. Yoshimitsu Zautsu & Connected Matters – Delhi High Court Clarifies Taxability of Employer-Paid Tax, Social Security, Pension and Non-Monetary Perquisites under Sections 10(10CC) and 17 of the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
26/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 145
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessees were expatriate employees deputed or seconded to work in India by foreign companies and multinational entities. Under employment arrangements, the employers bore Indian income-tax liabil...

Commissioner of Income Tax: Delhi-VIII vs Ashok Mittal – Set-off of Brought Forward Speculative Losses under Section 73 of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
26/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 326
Read More »
Facts of the Case: The assessee, Ashok Mittal, in the return for A.Y. 2000-01, set off carried forward speculation losses from A.Y. 1998-1999 (75,39,186/-) and A.Y. 1999-2000 (14,43,625/-) against the curr...