Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
The Motor & General Finance Ltd. & Ors. vs Commissioner of Income Tax-VI, New Delhi | Delhi High Court Clarifies When Interest on Income Tax Refund Is Payable Under Sections 240, 243 & 244A of the Income-tax Act
Facts of the
CaseThe present batch of appeals was filed by various
assessees including The Motor & General Finance Ltd., MGF India Ltd.,
Goodwill (India) Ltd., and MGM (India) Ltd. before the Delhi High Court.The ...
Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) v. Assessee – Addition on Account of Allegedly Undisclosed Stock Based on Inflated Stock Statements Furnished to Bank Not Sustainable | Delhi High Court
Facts of the CaseThe assessee had submitted stock statements to its
banker showing stock quantities and values higher than those reflected in its
books of account. The inflated figures were furnished for obtaining fina...
The Motor & General Finance Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax-VI, New Delhi | No Interest on Interest Where Statutory Refund Interest is Paid Along with Tax Refund under Section 243 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 | Delhi High Court
Facts of the
CaseThe assessees had originally filed their income-tax
returns and paid taxes through TDS and advance tax. Upon processing of the
returns under Section 143(1)(a), excess tax paid was refunded together wi...
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Assessee (ITA No. 75/2008) – Delhi High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal Due to Low Tax Effect Below Prescribed Monetary Limit
Facts of the Case
The
Revenue preferred an appeal before the Delhi High Court under the
provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
During
the hearing, it was noted that the tax effect involved in...
Commissioner of Income Tax (LTU) vs. Sharda Motor Industrial Ltd. – Additional Depreciation Claim Through Revised Return and Tax Treatment of Running Royalty as Revenue Expenditure under Sections 32(1)(iia) and 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Sharda Motor Industrial Ltd., filed
its income-tax return on 27.11.2003 declaring income under the MAT provisions.
Subsequently, within the permissible period, it filed a revised return o...
Commissioner of Income-Tax-V vs. Ramsons Organics Limited: Section 10B Deduction Allowed for Marble, Granite and Stone Processing as Manufacturing Activity
Facts of the Case
Assessee's
Business: The Assessee is engaged in running a
100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) at Dhoka, Gurgaon, dealing in the business
of processing stone, marble, granite, etc., and e...
Reinterpreting Capital vs. Revenue Expenditure: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Delhi High Court’s Landmark Judgment in CIT vs. Selan Exploration Technology Ltd.
Facts of the CaseThe respondent (hereinafter referred to as the
"assessee") is a limited company engaged in business activities
concerning crude oil production across three oil fields (Bakrol, Indora, and
Lohar) with ...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Assessee (ITA No. 225/2007) | Delhi High Court – Interest Income from Fixed Deposits Not Eligible for Section 80HHC Deduction; Bank Charges Cannot Be Reduced from Export Turnover
Facts of the
Case
The assessee claimed deduction under Section 80HHC in respect of
interest income amounting to Rs. 53,32,448 earned from fixed deposits with
banks and companies.
The assessee also incurr...
Commissioner of Income Tax-III vs. Senior India Private Limited: Revenue vs. Capital Expenditure on Trademark Licence Fees and Technical Know-How Royalty under Sections 32(1)(ii) and 260A of the Income-Tax Act
Facts of the CaseThe Respondent-Assessee ($M/s$ Senior India
Private Limited) is an Indian company engaged in the manufacturing of flexible
metal hoses and assemblies. Incorporated on October 1, 1996, the company
shor...
Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-II vs. KSA Technopak (India) Pvt. Ltd. Section 80-O Deduction – Only Common Expenses Can Be Apportioned Between Domestic and Foreign Earnings; Exclusively Domestic Expenses Cannot Be Allocated to Foreign Receipts
Facts of the
Case
The assessee earned consultancy income from both domestic and
foreign clients.
Foreign consultancy receipts amounted to ₹1,11,63,213.
Deduction under Section 80-O amounting to ₹48,28,47...