Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,766,307
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Recovery of Rs.170 Crore Before Expiry of Appeal Period Held Contrary to Deemed Stay Under Section 107: Andhra Pradesh High Court Directs Release of Funds Beyond Statutory Pre-Deposit in Wingtech Mobile Communications vs Deputy Commissioner ST (Writ Petition No. 22461 of 2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/09/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 79
Read More »
Facts of the Case Wingtech Mobile Communications (India) Pvt Ltd was assessed on 02.08.2025 for a demand of Rs.244,63,28,470 under Section 73(9) of the APGST Act, 2017. Its bank account had earlier been provisionally at...

GST Registration Cancellation Set Aside Following Suguna Cutpiece Formula: Madras High Court Directs Restoration Subject to Return Filing and ITC Scrutiny Conditions in Mamundy vs Commercial Tax Officer, Ponmalai (W.P.(MD) No.30023 of 2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/09/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 73
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner Mamundy's GST registration was cancelled by the Commercial Tax Officer, Ponmalai, Trichy, vide an order bearing Reference No. ZA330924301742Q dated 26.09.2024. Aggrieved, the petitioner ...

Karnataka High Court Declines to Examine Section 129(3) Penalty on Merits, Relegates Assessee to Statutory Appeal and Excludes Four Years of Writ Pendency From Limitation in Mysore Steels vs Commercial Tax Officer, Enforcement-8 (WP No. 3936 of 2022)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/09/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 63
Read More »
Facts of the CaseM/s Mysore Steels, a proprietorship represented by Mr. A.M. Shabandri, challenged a penalty order dated 23.03.2020 passed under Section 129(3) of the CGST Act and the corresponding State/UTGST provisions...

Karnataka High Court Directs Government Agencies to Reimburse Differential GST-VAT Amount to Works Contractors, Following Chandrashekaraiah Precedent — S Vinith Kumar vs State of Karnataka (WP No. 33994 of 2024)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/09/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 72
Read More »
Facts of the Case: The petitioners, S. Vinith Kumar and Mohan S., were civil contractors who had executed works contracts for various Executive Engineer divisions of the Cauvery Neeravari Nigama Limited (CNNL) and the Pu...

Denial of Cross-Examination in Fake ITC Case Upheld: Calcutta High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 74 Bogus Input Tax Credit Order in Sanjay Chamaria vs Principal Chief Commissioner, CGST and CX, Kolkata (WPA 10125 of 2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/09/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 69
Read More »
Facts of the Case Sanjay Chamaria, engaged in a trading business dealing in gifts, novelties, toys and household plastic articles from Bagri Market, Kolkata, was issued a show-cause notice dated 3rd August 2024 under Se...

Marginal 35-Day Delay in Filing GST Appeal Deserves Indulgence: Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Directs Admission of Belated Appeal Without Reference to Limitation in Anil Kumar vs Deputy Commissioner (GST Appeal), Tirunelveli (W.P(MD)No.23902 of 2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/09/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 66
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Anil Kumar, holding GSTIN 33AJQPP4461M1ZM, was aggrieved by an order dated 16.12.2024 passed by the State Tax Officer for the tax period 2019-20. He filed a first appeal on 21.04.2025 bef...

Karnataka High Court Sets Aside GST Registration Cancellation on Petitioner's Undertaking to File Returns and Pay Arrears of Tax and Penalty — Dhiraj Kumar vs State of Karnataka (WP No. 8890 of 2026)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/09/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 71
Read More »
Facts of the Case: Dhiraj Kumar, proprietor of M/s Riddhi Diamonds and holder of GSTIN 29AHSPD2418E1ZE, had his GST registration cancelled by an order dated 29.08.2023 passed in Form GST REG-19 by the Assistant Commissio...

Ex Parte GST Order Over Portal-Only Notice Quashed on 25% Pre-Deposit: Madras High Court Restores ITC Access and Directs Fresh Hearing in M/s. MGG Trading Private Limited vs Deputy Commissioner, GST Appeal (W.P.(MD) No.23610 of 2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/09/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 68
Read More »
Facts of the Case M/s. MGG Trading Private Limited (GSTIN 33AAHCM7526M1Z4), Tirunelveli, challenged an ex parte order dated 30.09.2024 (Order No. ZD330924200837B) for FY 2018-19, passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Co...

Personal Hearing Mandatory Before Any Section 73 GST Demand: Uttarakhand High Court Quashes Assessment and Appellate Orders in Shakumbari Engineering Work vs Commissioner of SGST, Following Sri Sai Vishwas Polymers (Writ Petition No. 798 of 2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/09/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 72
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Shakumbari Engineering Work, challenged an order dated 27.12.2023 passed under Section 73 of the Uttarakhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 by the Assistant Commissioner, as well as a f...

Delhi High Court Directs Reflection of Transitional ITC of Rs 99.18 Lakh in Electronic Credit Ledger of Input Service Distributor Despite Portal Glitch — Clyde Pumps Private Limited vs Union of India (W.P.(C) 4400/2022)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/09/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 72
Read More »
Facts of the Case: Clyde Pumps Private Limited, a Delhi-based manufacturer of general-purpose machinery, was registered as an Input Service Distributor (ISD) under the GST regime and had accumulated CENVAT credit of Rs. ...