My Professional Blog

Facts of the CaseThe Revenue preferred multiple appeals before the Delhi High Court against various assessees including Mohan Meakins Ltd., National Industries Corporation Ltd., Superior Industries Ltd., DCM Shriram I...

CIT Delhi-IV vs M/s DLF Ltd. (2012:DHC:5777-DB) – Whether Section 263 Can Be Invoked for Section 14A Disallowance Without Unsustainable Error

My Tax Expert

20/05/2026 | 0 COMMENTS | VISITOR'S COUNT: 140

Facts of the CaseThe assessee, M/s DLF Ltd., engaged in real estate and development activities, filed its return for Assessment Year 2002-03 declaring income of approximately Rs. 11.44 crores. During assessment procee...

Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) Vs. Saraya Industries Ltd. – Delhi High Court on Applicability of Earlier Lead Judgment and Revenue Appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act

My Tax Expert

20/05/2026 | 0 COMMENTS | VISITOR'S COUNT: 144

Facts of the Case· Multiple appeals were filed by the Revenue against different assessees, including Saraya Industries Ltd. and other companies.· &nbs...

Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)–III vs Mohan Meakins Ltd. & Connected Assessees | Delhi High Court on Block Assessment, Search Proceedings and Addition Based on Material Evidence

My Tax Expert

20/05/2026 | 0 COMMENTS | VISITOR'S COUNT: 133

Facts of the Case· The Income Tax Department preferred multiple appeals before the Delhi High Court against different assessees.· &n...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Morgan Securities & Credits Pvt Ltd: Retrospective 'Regrouping' of Stock-in-Trade to Investment – Delhi High Court Judgment

My Tax Expert

20/05/2026 | 0 COMMENTS | VISITOR'S COUNT: 129

Facts of the Case The Assessee is a private limited company engaged in the business of trading and finance. For the Assessment Year (AY) 2005-06, the Assessee filed its return of income declaring a tota...

Director of Income Tax vs Hans Raj Samarak Society | Delhi High Court on Anonymous Donations, Section 68 and Exemption under Sections 11 & 115BBC of Income Tax Act

My Tax Expert

20/05/2026 | 0 COMMENTS | VISITOR'S COUNT: 111

Facts of the Case The assessee, Hans Raj Samarak Society, received donations during the relevant assessment year. The Assessing Officer treated certain donations as anonymous donations and further allege...

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) - I vs Mohan Meakins Limited & Others: Income Tax Appeal No. 430/2013 – 437/2013, Important Legal Findings under Income Tax Act Facts of the Case: The case involves a series of Income Tax Appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) against different companies, including Mohan Meakins Limited, National Industries Corporation Ltd, and Superior Industries Ltd. These companies contested the income tax assessments issued by the tax authorities, and the matter was adjudicated by the Delhi High Court. The petitioners, i.e., the tax authorities, raised concerns regarding tax assessments for the relevant periods, while the respondents, i.e., the companies, contended that the assessments were incorrect and challenged the rulings. Issues Involved: 1. Whether the tax assessments made by the Commissioner of Income Tax were correct. 2. Whether the claims of the companies (respondents) on tax issues, deductions, and income computations were valid. 3. Interpretation of relevant provisions under the Income Tax Act as they pertain to corporate tax liabilities. Petitioner’s Arguments: The petitioner, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), argued that the income tax assessments had been correctly made based on the applicable tax laws. The petitioner contended that the respondents failed to meet their tax obligations under the Income Tax Act and thus their appeals should be rejected. Respondent’s Arguments: The respondents, including Mohan Meakins Limited and other companies, contested the assessments and argued that the tax liabilities had been miscalculated. They cited discrepancies in the tax assessments and sought revisions or waivers based on their legal arguments and the specifics of their business operations. Court Order/Findings: The Delhi High Court ruled in favor of the petitioners in certain cases and granted partial relief to the respondents in others. The court clarified several procedural issues regarding tax assessments and re-emphasized the application of specific sections under the Income Tax Act, making it clear that tax assessments need to be carried out in line with both the letter and spirit of the law. Important Clarifications: 1. The court upheld that the proper application of sections under the Income Tax Act is vital to the determination of tax liabilities, and deviations from such applications could lead to incorrect assessments. 2. The judgment provided clarity on the methodology for calculating deductions and exemptions, especially for corporate entities under the Income Tax Act. Sections Involved: • Section 144 (Assessment of Income) • Section 147 (Reassessment) • Section 263 (Revision of Orders) • Section 271 (Penalty for Concealment of Income) Blog Keywords: #IncomeTaxAppeal, #IncomeTaxLaw, #IncomeTaxAct, #MohanMeakinsLimited, #NationalIndustriesCorporationLtd, #SuperiorIndustriesLtd, #TaxLitigation, #CITCentral, #IndianTaxCases, #DelhiHighCourtJudgment, #ITA4292013 Blog Description (Meta Description): This blog covers the detailed findings of the Delhi High Court in a series of Income Tax Appeals involving the Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) and various companies including Mohan Meakins Limited, National Industries Corporation Ltd, and Superior Industries Ltd. The case deals with important tax litigation under the Income Tax Act, shedding light on procedural issues and key legal clarifications. Link to Full Judgment (PDF): https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/case_number_pdf/2015:DHC:688-DB/RKG22012015ITA2542014.pdf Disclaimer: This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.

My Tax Expert

20/05/2026 | 0 COMMENTS | VISITOR'S COUNT: 107

Facts of the Case: The case involves a series of Income Tax Appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) against different companies, including Mohan Meakins Limited, National Industries Corporati...

Director of Income Tax vs Italian Thai Development Co Ltd: Deductibility of Upfront Fees and Bank Charges under Section 40(a)(ii) & Section 35AB

My Tax Expert

20/05/2026 | 0 COMMENTS | VISITOR'S COUNT: 118

Proposed Title for Google (VS Form)Facts of the CaseThe appellant, Director of Income Tax, challenged the order of the ITAT (dated 25.11.2011, ITA No.2560/Del/2011) which allowed the respondent, Italian Thai Developm...

Ram Piyari Devi Charitable Trust vs. Director General of Income Tax: Delhi High Court Ruling on Section 10(23C)(vi) Exemption for Educational Institution

My Tax Expert

20/05/2026 | 0 COMMENTS | VISITOR'S COUNT: 110

Facts of the Case The petitioner is a registered Trust under a Deed of Settlement dated July 21, 1998, and holds registration under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act. The Trust is actively engaged in ru...

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) I vs. Mohan Meakins Limited (ITA Nos. 430-433/2013): Income Tax Appeal, Section 37 Clarification & Court's Findings

My Tax Expert

20/05/2026 | 0 COMMENTS | VISITOR'S COUNT: 105

Facts of the Case:This case deals with Income Tax Appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) I against Mohan Meakins Limited, regarding the issue of certain expenses claimed by the respondent. The primar...

Previous
1
...
699
700
701
702
703
...
1303
Next

Auditing

General

Government Notification

GST

ICAI

ICSI

Income Tax

Intellectual Property India

MCA/ROC

Services

STUDENTS

Total Site Visits

Knowledge Portal