Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,846,610
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Assessee (Name Not Disclosed) | Delhi High Court | ITA No. 1574/2010 | Assessment under Section 144 Invalid Due to Non-Service of Notice at Correct Address

Author
My Tax Expert
09/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 263
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Assessing Officer passed a best judgment assessment under Section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessment was framed on the basis that the assessee had failed to respon...

[Assessee Name] vs Commissioner of Income Tax – Delhi High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal as Identical Issue Already Decided | ITA No. 1583/2010

Author
My Tax Expert
09/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 244
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appeal before the Delhi High Court arose from an order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Court noted that the issue raised in the present appeal was identical to an issue that had al...

M/s. All India J.D. Educational Society vs. Director General of Income Tax (Exemptions), Delhi | Delay in Application under Section 10(23C)(via) and Rejection of Tax Exemption Due to Non-Genuine Charitable Activities | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
09/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 277
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s. All India J.D. Educational Society, was a registered educational society running J.D. Ayurvedic Medical College and Hospital at Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh.The society applied before th...

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Assessee (Name Not Mentioned) | Addition Based on Dumb Documents Found During Search – Delhi High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal | ITA No. 1590/2010

Author
My Tax Expert
09/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 272
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue preferred an appeal before the Delhi High Court challenging the findings recorded by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT).The Asses...

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Vinitec Corporation Pvt. Ltd. | Foreign Travel Expenses, Warranty Provision & Section 234B Interest – Delhi High Court (ITR No. 1165/2009)

Author
My Tax Expert
09/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 278
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), which had allowed the assessee's claims relating to foreign travel and conveyance expenses incurred by its employees and pr...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. [Assessee Name]: Admissibility of Foreign Travel and Conveyance Expenses as Business Deductions (ITA 1051/2009 & 1166/2009)

Author
My Tax Expert
09/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 255
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed 25% of the foreign travel and conveyance expenses claimed by the assessee for its employees. Upon further appeal, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]...

Mother Dairy Fruit & Vegetable Pvt. Ltd. vs. CIT: TDS on Salary Paid to Non-Residents Outside India | Delhi High Court Judgment

Author
My Tax Expert
09/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 272
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Appellant, an Indian company, maintained a marketing office in Rotterdam, Netherlands, to support its export operations. During the assessment year 2002-03, the company remitted funds from India to...

Karan Raghav Export (P) Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court) – Depreciation on Building Contributed to Partnership Firm and Deductibility of Insurance Premium under Sections 32, 10(2A), 14A & 28(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
09/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 290
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Karan Raghav Export (P) Ltd., was a private limited company and owner of a factory building situated at 225, Udyog Vihar, Phase-I, Gurgaon, Haryana.The assessee became a partner in a part...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Paramount Communications Ltd.: Deletion of Deemed Addition Under Section 68 on Account of Excess Surrendered Stock Discovered During Survey Operation Under Section 133A of Income Tax Act 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
09/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 268
Read More »
Facts of the Case Survey Operations: On 24th December, 2002, a regular survey operation under Section 133A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, was carried out by the Revenue authorities on the business premi...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s. Paramount Products (P) Ltd.: Remand for Fact-Finding on Eligibility of Weighted Deduction Under Section 35B(1)(b)(iv) of the Income-tax Act on Commission Paid to Foreign Agents Without Verification of Agency Agreements

Author
My Tax Expert
09/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 207
Read More »
Facts of the Case Assessee and Assessment Years: The case involves a single corporate assessee, M/s. Paramount Products (P) Ltd., and pertains to two specific assessment years: 1982-83 and 1983-84. ...