Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,229,614
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Montage Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court, 2018) – Section 80-IB Deduction, Royalty Allocation & Reassessment under Section 153A

Author
My Tax Expert
29/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 178
Read More »
  Facts of the CaseThe respondent-assessee, engaged in manufacturing flexible packaging materials, operated three units located at Jammu, Malanpur, and Noida. The Jammu unit was eligible for deduction under S...

Karan Luthra vs Income Tax Officer (ITO) | Delhi High Court | Section 276CC Income Tax Act – Prosecution for Non-Filing of Returns Upheld

Author
My Tax Expert
29/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 225
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner (assessee) failed to file income tax returns for Assessment Years 2003–04, 2004–05, and 2005–06 within the prescribed time under Section 139(1) of the Income Tax Act. Despite issua...

Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) vs. Society for Indian Automobile Manufacturers (2018) – Delhi High Court | Section 260A, 12A, 80G Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
29/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 189
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present appeal was filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for Assessment Year 2011–12.The assessee, Society for...

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-7 vs Rambagh Palace Hotels Pvt. Ltd. (2018) – Section 37(1) Disallowance of Repair & Maintenance Expenses

Author
My Tax Expert
29/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 172
Read More »
 Facts of the Case The assessee, Rambagh Palace Hotels Pvt. Ltd., claimed substantial repair and maintenance expenses for AY 2005–06. The Assessing Officer (AO): Allowed ₹4.0...

R. Commissioner of Income Tax–6 vs Mary Kay Cosmetics Pvt. Ltd. (2018) – Delhi High Court | Section 37(1) & Transfer Pricing | Bright Line Method Rejected

Author
My Tax Expert
29/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 194
Read More »
 Facts of the Case The respondent-assessee, Mary Kay Cosmetics Pvt. Ltd., was a wholly owned subsidiary of a US-based entity engaged as an exclusive distributor of products in India. The ...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs M/s Ansal Properties and Industries Ltd. (Delhi High Court) – Taxability of Security Deposit as Undisclosed Income under Sections 158B(b), 158BA & 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
29/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 218
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe case arose from a search and seizure operation under Section 132 conducted on the Ansal Group. During the search, a confidential note was seized indicating that a transaction involving ₹42 ...

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-3 vs Surya Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. | Section 260A Income Tax Act | Delhi High Court | CBDT Circular No. 3/2018 | Revenue Appeal Dismissed on Low Tax Effect

Author
My Tax Expert
29/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 175
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue preferred multiple income tax appeals before the Delhi High Court against a consolidated order involving Surya Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. The appeals were filed under Section 260A of the Income Ta...

Sigma Freudenberg NOK Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi & Anr. (Delhi High Court) – Restoration of Appeal & Right to Challenge Royalty Attribution, (Section 260A (Appeal to High Court))

Author
My Tax Expert
29/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 170
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appellant-assessee had filed appeals before the Delhi High Court for Assessment Years 2003-04, 2004-05, and 2005-06. During the hearing, the assessee chose not to press the appeals on account of sm...

Oscar Fernandes & Rahul Gandhi vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court, 2018) – Writ Petitions Challenging Income Tax Proceedings Dismissed

Author
My Tax Expert
29/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 196
Read More »
FACTS OF THE CASE The petitioners approached the Delhi High Court by way of writ petitions under Article 226. The petitions were filed against actions of the Income Tax Department. Multiple ...

Sigma Freudenberg NOK Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. | Delhi High Court | Restoration of Appeal & Royalty Attribution Issue, (Income tax act,1961)

Author
My Tax Expert
29/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 184
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Sigma Freudenberg NOK Pvt. Ltd., had filed multiple appeals before the Delhi High Court for Assessment Years 2003-04, 2004-05, and 2005-06. During the hearing, the assessee chose not to p...