Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,855,395
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s Sidhartha Securities and Traders Ltd. – Whether Journal Entries Without Cash Movement Attract Penalty under Sections 269SS and 271D of the Income Tax Act, 1961 | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
23/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 288
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Revenue alleged that the respondent assessee had accepted an unsecured loan amounting to Rs. 8,52,71,500 from M/s Oswal Agro Mills Ltd., otherwise than through account payee cheque or...

Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s National Clothing Co. – Penalty under Sections 269SS & 271D of Income Tax Act on Journal/Book Entries without Cash Transaction

Author
My Tax Expert
23/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 383
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee had recorded loan-related entries of ₹33,75,842 from M/s Shakuntla Export House Pvt. Ltd. and ₹20,00,000 relating to K.N. Bhalla. The Assessing Officer rejected the ass...

AVTEC Limited vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax – Reassessment under Sections 147 & 148 of the Income Tax Act Beyond Four Years Invalid in Absence of Failure to Make Full and True Disclosure | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
23/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 271
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, AVTEC Limited, had originally undergone assessment under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act on 24.12.2008 for Assessment Year 2006-07. Subsequently, a notice dated 28....

AVTEC Limited vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court) – Reopening of Assessment under Sections 147 & 148 Invalid in Absence of Failure to Disclose Material Facts

Author
My Tax Expert
23/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 272
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, AVTEC Limited, had originally undergone assessment under Section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act on 24.12.2008 for Assessment Year 2006–07. Subsequently, a notice dated 2...

Dharamshila Cancer Foundation and Research Centre vs Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) & Another – Delhi High Court on Section 197 Certificate for Nil TDS Rate and Timely Disposal of Applications under the Income-tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
23/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 288
Read More »
Facts of the CaseDharamshila Cancer Foundation and Research Centre filed a writ petition concerning the issuance of a certificate under Section 197 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The petitioner contended that TDS on its...

Commissioner of Income Tax–9 vs Narain Dass Taneja | Reassessment u/s 147 & Notice u/s 148 Cannot Be Sustained Where Full and True Disclosure Was Made During Original Assessment | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
23/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 299
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee filed return of income for Assessment Year 2004–05 declaring a loss of ₹6,21,629. Original assessment was completed under Section 143(3) on 17.11.2006. During the ori...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-IV vs Shiv Raj Gupta | Taxability of Non-Compete Fee under Section 28(ii) of the Income Tax Act – Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
23/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 289
Read More »
Facts of the Case Shri Shiv Raj Gupta was Chairman-cum-Managing Director of M/s Central Distillery and Breweries Ltd. (CDBL), a listed public company engaged in manufacturing and sale of IMFL and beer. Th...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs M/s Harig India Limited – Job Work Manufacturing of Gold Jewellery Held as Manufacturing Activity Eligible for Deduction under Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
23/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 351
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee company had been engaged in manufacturing and sale of hydraulics, machine tools, parts, components and assemblies and had also commenced export of jewellery. For Assessment...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-II vs Home Developers Pvt. Ltd. | Delhi High Court on Penalty under Sections 269SS, 271D & Cash Transaction Allegations Based on Loose Papers

Author
My Tax Expert
23/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 285
Read More »
Facts of the CaseA search and seizure operation was conducted under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act wherein certain loose papers and documents were recovered from Shri Yogesh Gupta and other connected premises. Duri...

Commissioner of Income Tax-XIII vs Hitesh Bansal – Section 40A(3) Disallowance on Cash Payments, Commercial Expediency & Aggregation of Cash Transactions | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
23/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 328
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal before the Delhi High Court against the order dated 9 May 2014 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for Assessment Year 2008-09. The respondent-assessee, Hitesh Bans...