Facts of the Case
The petitioner, M/s GMT Industries Ltd.,
engaged in the manufacture and supply of Tube Mill Equipments, dispatched goods
from Faridabad, Haryana to Tata Steel Ltd., Jamshedpur under a valid tax
invoice and E-Way Bill. During transit, the vehicle was intercepted by the
State Tax authorities at Jamshedpur. The authorities alleged that the E-Way
Bill had been cancelled during transit and detained the vehicle.
Proceedings under Section 129 of the GST Act were
initiated, and tax along with penalty amounting to ₹13,68,000 was
imposed. To secure the release of the goods and vehicle, the petitioner
deposited the amount under protest. The petitioner challenged both the
jurisdiction of the State Tax Officer to initiate proceedings in an inter-State
transaction and the legality of the detention and penalty order.
Issues Involved
- Whether the State Tax Officer had jurisdiction to initiate
proceedings under Section 129 of the GST Act in respect of an inter-State
supply governed by the IGST Act.
- Whether tax and penalty could be imposed merely because the E-Way
Bill was cancelled during transit without any finding of tax evasion.
- Whether the petitioner should be relegated to the statutory
appellate remedy under Section 107 of the JGST Act.
Petitioner’s Arguments
- The transaction was an inter-State supply, and therefore
proceedings ought to have been undertaken in accordance with the
provisions applicable under the IGST Act read with the CGST Act.
- The State Tax Officer lacked jurisdiction to conduct proceedings
under Section 129 in respect of the inter-State movement of goods.
- The goods were fully tax-paid, and there was no allegation or
finding of tax evasion.
- The E-Way Bill was allegedly cancelled during transit without the
knowledge of the petitioner.
- The penalty order was passed without supplying a copy of the order
to the petitioner.
- A temporary GST registration was created in the name of the truck
driver, which prevented the petitioner from effectively filing an appeal
after the temporary registration expired.
- The amount was deposited only under protest to obtain release of
the detained goods and vehicle.
Respondent’s Arguments
- The State contended that the writ petition was not maintainable
because an effective statutory remedy of appeal was available under
Section 107 of the JGST Act.
- Since the dispute involved questions of fact, the petitioner should
first approach the appellate authority instead of invoking the writ
jurisdiction of the High Court.
Court Order / Findings
The Jharkhand High Court observed that an effective
alternative remedy by way of appeal under Section 107 of the JGST Act was
available to the petitioner.
Accordingly, the Court:
- Granted liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the
appellate authority.
- Directed the State Tax Officer to provide the necessary GSTIN details
to enable the petitioner to file the appeal online.
- Clarified that if the online filing was not possible due to
technical reasons, the petitioner would be permitted to file the appeal
manually.
- Allowed the petitioner to raise all factual and legal issues before
the appellate authority.
- Clarified that it had not examined the merits of the controversy
and disposed of the writ petition accordingly.
Important Clarification
- Availability of an effective statutory appellate remedy ordinarily
prevents the High Court from entertaining a writ petition.
- The appellate authority must consider all legal and factual issues
independently.
- Technical difficulties in filing GST appeals should not deprive an
assessee of the statutory right of appeal.
- The High Court may direct the tax authorities to facilitate filing
of an appeal where procedural issues exist, without expressing any opinion
on the merits of the dispute.
Sections
Involved
- Section 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
- Section 107 of the Jharkhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
- Section 20 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
- GST MOV-02
- GST MOV-06
- GST MOV-07
- GST MOV-09
- GST DRC-07
Link to download the order -
https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1782969590_82compressed.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general
information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify
the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal,
professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim
all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been
prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment