Facts of the Case
The petitioner, M/s Gordhandas Gobindram A Company,
had been awarded a public works contract prior to the implementation of the
Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime on 1 July 2017. After GST came into
force, the petitioner incurred an additional tax burden while executing the
contract.
The petitioner sought reimbursement of this additional GST
liability from the State authorities by relying upon the State Government's
policy decision dated 10.10.2018, which provided for reimbursement of
additional GST liability arising in respect of contracts awarded before the
introduction of GST.
The petitioner also relied upon an earlier judgment of the
Chhattisgarh High Court in M/s D.A. Enterprises vs State of Chhattisgarh
& Others, where similar relief had been granted.
Issues Involved
- Whether
a contractor executing a contract awarded before the introduction of GST
is entitled to reimbursement of additional GST liability incurred after
implementation of GST.
- Whether
the respondents were required to consider the petitioner's claim in
accordance with the State Government's policy dated 10.10.2018.
- Whether
the petitioner should be directed to submit fresh documentary evidence to
establish the additional GST liability.
Petitioner's Arguments
- The
petitioner contended that the work contract had been awarded before the
GST regime came into force.
- Due
to the implementation of GST from 01.07.2017, the petitioner became
liable to pay additional taxes that were not contemplated at the time of
execution of the contract.
- The
petitioner relied upon the State Government's policy dated 10.10.2018,
which specifically provided for reimbursement of additional GST liability
in respect of contracts awarded before GST implementation.
- It
was further argued that the issue was already settled by the Chhattisgarh
High Court in M/s D.A. Enterprises vs State of Chhattisgarh &
Others, wherein similar relief had been granted under identical facts.
Respondents' Arguments
- The
State submitted that the petitioner's claim could be considered subject to
submission of a fresh claim along with complete documentary proof
demonstrating the actual additional GST liability incurred.
- The
respondents stated that upon submission of the relevant documents, the
petitioner's claim would be examined in accordance with the Government
Order dated 10.10.2018.
Court Order / Findings
The High Court observed that the controversy was
substantially covered by its earlier judgment in M/s D.A. Enterprises vs
State of Chhattisgarh & Others involving identical facts.
Accordingly, the Court disposed of the writ petition with
the following directions:
- The
petitioner was permitted to submit a fresh claim before the competent
authorities.
- The
petitioner was directed to furnish all necessary documentary evidence
establishing the additional GST liability incurred due to the introduction
of GST within one week.
- Upon
receipt of the claim along with supporting documents and a copy of the
Court's order, the concerned authorities were directed to scrutinize the
claim.
- The
authorities were directed to take an appropriate decision within 90
days from the date of receipt of the claim while keeping in view the
Government policy dated 10.10.2018.
- No
order as to costs was passed.
Important Clarification
- Contractors
executing pre-GST contracts cannot automatically receive
reimbursement merely because GST was introduced.
- The
contractor must establish the actual additional GST liability by
producing proper documentary evidence.
- The
competent authority is obligated to consider such claims in accordance
with the State Government's reimbursement policy.
- The
judgment reinforces that similarly situated contractors are entitled to
have their claims examined fairly and consistently in light of the
Government's policy and earlier judicial precedents.
Section Involved
- Goods
and Services Tax provisions relating to transition from the pre-GST regime
to GST.
- Government
Policy dated 10.10.2018 governing reimbursement of additional GST
liability for contracts awarded before 01.07.2017.
Link to download the order -
https://mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1782969150_116compressed.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and
knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information
from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or
advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability
arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the
assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment