Facts of the Case
The petitioner, M/s. Mirtunjai Udyog, challenged
an assessment order passed by the Sales Tax Authorities before the Orissa High
Court by filing a writ petition.
During the hearing, the petitioner relied upon the
earlier judgment of the Orissa High Court in M/s. The Snow White Trading
Corporation vs. State of Orissa, (2014) 71 VST 351 (Orissa) and submitted
that the controversy involved in the present writ petition was fully covered by
the principles laid down in that decision.
Accordingly, the petitioner sought appropriate
relief from the High Court while pursuing the statutory appellate remedy
against the assessment order.
Issues Involved
- Whether the petitioner should be permitted to pursue the statutory
appellate remedy against the assessment order while relying upon the
earlier binding judgment of the High Court.
- Whether the interim protection granted by the High Court should
continue until the appellate authority decides the appeal.
- Whether the High Court should express any opinion on the merits of
the assessment dispute while disposing of the writ petition.
Petitioner’s Arguments
- The petitioner submitted that the controversy raised in the writ
petition was already covered by the judgment of the Orissa High Court in M/s.
The Snow White Trading Corporation vs. State of Orissa (2014) 71 VST 351
(Orissa).
- It was requested that the petitioner be permitted to place the said
judgment before the appellate authority while filing the statutory appeal
against the impugned assessment order.
- The petitioner also sought continuation of the interim protection
granted earlier by the High Court.
Respondent’s Arguments
The order does not record any detailed submissions
advanced on behalf of the opposite parties. The State was represented by the
learned Additional Standing Counsel for the CT & GST Organisation.
Court Order / Findings
The Orissa High Court disposed of the writ petition
with the following directions:
- The petitioner was permitted to place the earlier judgment in M/s.
The Snow White Trading Corporation vs. State of Orissa (2014) 71 VST 351
(Orissa) before the appellate authority while filing the statutory
appeal against the impugned assessment order.
- The interim order granted by the High Court on 24 August 2017
was directed to continue until the appellate authority passes an
appropriate order, provided that the petitioner files the appeal along
with the necessary application on or before 8 February 2023.
- The Court expressly clarified that it had not expressed any
opinion on the merits of the dispute.
- The original annexures were directed to be returned after
substitution with attested photocopies, and urgent certified copies of the
order were directed to be issued as per rules.
Important Clarification
- The High Court did not adjudicate the merits of the
assessment dispute.
- The petitioner was relegated to the statutory appellate remedy with
liberty to rely upon the earlier binding judgment.
- Interim protection was continued to safeguard the petitioner's
rights until consideration by the appellate authority, subject to timely
filing of the appeal.
- The order reinforces the principle that where an effective
statutory appellate remedy exists, the High Court may permit the assessee
to pursue that remedy while preserving interim protection in appropriate
cases.
Sections
Involved
- Relevant provisions governing assessment and statutory appeal under
the applicable Orissa Sales Tax Law.
- Principles relating to the availability of an alternative statutory remedy and reliance on binding judicial precedent.
Link to download the order -
https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1782984104_149compressed.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general
information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify
the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal,
professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim
all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been
prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment