Facts of the Case
The petitioner, M/s. Ramesh Javery & Co.,
challenged the assessment proceedings initiated under the Odisha Entry Tax Act
before the High Court of Orissa. The principal grievance was that the
assessment order passed under Section 9C of the OET Act was barred by
limitation prescribed under Section 9C(6). The petitioner further
contended that the Audit Visit Report (AVR) in Form E-27 had also been
submitted beyond the limitation period prescribed under Section 9B(2)
read with Rule 11(5)(c) of the OET Rules.
The matter came before the High Court after the Tribunal had
upheld the assessment order. The Court also noted that repeated adjournments
had already been granted to the Department for production of the original
records, and therefore declined any further request for adjournment.
Issues Involved
- Whether
the assessment order passed by the Assessing Authority under Section 9C
of the Odisha Entry Tax Act was barred by limitation under Section
9C(6).
- Whether
the submission of the Audit Visit Report (AVR) in Form E-27 was
time-barred under Section 9B(2) read with Rule 11(5)(c) of
the Odisha Entry Tax Rules.
Petitioner's Arguments
The petitioner argued that:
- The
assessment order had been passed beyond the statutory limitation
prescribed under Section 9C(6) of the Odisha Entry Tax Act and was
therefore invalid.
- The
Audit Visit Report (AVR) in Form E-27 had also not been submitted within
the period prescribed under Section 9B(2) read with Rule
11(5)(c) of the OET Rules.
- Both
issues were already settled in favour of assessees by earlier decisions of
the High Court, and the impugned orders deserved to be quashed
accordingly.
Respondent's Arguments
The State defended the assessment proceedings and sought
further adjournment for production of the original records. However, the Court
rejected the request after observing that sufficient opportunities had already
been granted to the Department.
Court Order / Findings
The High Court allowed the revision petition and held as
follows:
- The
first issue relating to limitation under Section 9C(6) stood concluded
in favour of the petitioner by the earlier decision in M/s. Cobra
Instalaciones Y Servicios, S.A. v. Commissioner of Sales Tax, Cuttack
(Order dated 29 July 2021).
- The
second issue concerning limitation for submission of the Audit Visit
Report under Section 9B(2) read with Rule 11(5)(c) was also
covered in favour of the petitioner by the earlier judgments in:
- M/s.
Pal Construction v. The Assessing Authority, Bhubaneswar I Circle,
Bhubaneswar (Order dated 18 April 2022), and
- M/s.
Grihasthi Udyog v. Commissioner of Sales Tax
(Order dated 28 June 2022).
- Since
both questions were already settled by binding precedents, the Court set
aside:
- the
order of the Tribunal,
- the
order of the Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax (ACST), and
- the
assessment order passed by the Assessing Authority.
- The
Sales Tax Revision was accordingly allowed with no order as to costs.
Important Clarification
- Assessment
proceedings under Section 9C of the Odisha Entry Tax Act must
strictly comply with the limitation prescribed under Section 9C(6).
- The
Audit Visit Report (Form E-27) must also be submitted within the
limitation prescribed under Section 9B(2) read with Rule
11(5)(c) of the Odisha Entry Tax Rules.
- Any
assessment founded upon a time-barred Audit Visit Report or completed beyond
the statutory limitation is liable to be quashed.
- This
judgment reaffirms and follows the principles laid down in:
- M/s.
Cobra Instalaciones Y Servicios, S.A. v. Commissioner of Sales Tax,
Cuttack
- M/s.
Pal Construction v. The Assessing Authority, Bhubaneswar I Circle,
Bhubaneswar
- M/s.
Grihasthi Udyog v. Commissioner of Sales Tax.
Sections Involved
- Section
9C(6) of the Odisha Entry Tax Act (OET Act)
- Section
9B(2) of the Odisha Entry Tax Act
- Rule
11(5)(c) of the Odisha Entry Tax Rules
- Assessment
Proceedings under the Odisha Entry Tax Act
Link to download the order -
https://mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1782972394_186compressed.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and
knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information
from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or
advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability
arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the
assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment