Facts of the Case
The petitioner approached the High Court by filing
Writ Petition No. 37880 of 2022. During the proceedings, the respondent
authorities permitted the petitioner to upload Table 2 of TRAN-3 on the GST
Common Portal.
In view of the permission granted by the respondent
authorities and the availability of the facility to upload Table 2 of TRAN-3 on
the GST Common Portal, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted before the
Court that no further orders were required in the matter and requested that the
writ petition be closed.
Issues
Involved
The principal issue arising in the writ petition
concerned the petitioner’s ability to upload Table 2 of TRAN-3 on the GST
Common Portal.
The matter effectively ceased to require further
adjudication once the respondent authorities permitted the petitioner to
complete the relevant upload on the GST Common Portal.
Petitioner’s
Arguments
Learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Karan
Talwar, submitted that:
- The respondent authorities had permitted the petitioner to upload
Table 2 of TRAN-3 on the GST Common Portal.
- In view of such permission, no further orders were required from
the Court.
- Accordingly, the writ petition could be closed.
Respondent’s
Arguments
The order does not record any separate substantive
arguments advanced on behalf of the respondents. However, it specifically
records that the respondent authorities had permitted the petitioner to upload
Table 2 of TRAN-3 on the GST Common Portal.
Court Order
/ Findings
The High Court recorded the submission made by
learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondent authorities had permitted
the petitioner to upload Table 2 of TRAN-3 on the GST Common Portal and that,
consequently, no further orders were required in the matter.
Accordingly, the Court ordered as follows:
- The writ petition was closed.
- No order as to costs was made.
- Pending interlocutory applications, if any, were also directed to
stand closed.
The order was passed by the Division Bench
comprising Hon’ble Sri Justice U. Durga Prasad Rao and Hon’ble Sri Justice T.
Mallikarjuna Rao on 7 December 2022.
Important Clarification
The Court did not deliver a detailed adjudication
on the substantive merits of any disputed statutory interpretation. The writ
petition was closed because the respondent authorities had already permitted
the petitioner to upload Table 2 of TRAN-3 on the GST Common Portal, and the
petitioner’s counsel expressly submitted that no further orders were required.
Therefore, the order should be understood as a
closure of the writ proceedings following the grant of the relevant portal
facility or permission, rather than as a detailed pronouncement laying down a
broader proposition of law on transitional credit.
Sections /
Provisions Involved
The uploaded order does not expressly mention any
specific section of the CGST Act, 2017, SGST Act, 2017, or any particular rule
of the GST Rules.
The matter concerns:
- GST transitional compliance
- TRAN-3
- Uploading of Table 2 of TRAN-3
- GST Common Portal
- Writ jurisdiction
For accuracy, no specific statutory section or rule
should be attributed to this judgment unless verified from the complete case
record, pleadings, or cause-title documents.
Link to download the order -
https://mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1783069431_396compressed.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment