Facts of the Case
The Petitioner challenged the action of the
Opposite Parties in not reimbursing the differential tax amount arising from
the change in the tax regime from Value Added Tax (VAT) to Goods and Services
Tax (GST) with effect from 01.07.2017.
The dispute arose in the context of works contracts
where contractors faced difficulties because of the transition to GST. The
grievance of the Petitioner was that, after introduction of GST, the Petitioner
was required to pay tax that had not been envisaged when the agreement was
entered into.
The Petitioner submitted that the writ petition was
identical to W.P.(C) No. 5933 of 2020 and requested that it be disposed of in
terms of the order dated 18.02.2020 passed in that matter. The State did not
dispute this position.
The Court noted that the Government of Odisha,
Finance Department had issued revised guidelines relating to works contracts
under GST through Office Memorandum No. FIN-CTITAX-0045-2017/38535/F dated
10.12.2018, superseding the earlier guidelines dated 07.12.2017.
Issues
Involved
The principal issues before the Court were:
- Whether the Petitioner was entitled to consideration of
reimbursement of the differential tax burden arising from the transition
from VAT and other pre-GST indirect taxes to GST with effect from
01.07.2017.
- Whether additional GST liability in respect of works tendered or
contracted before 01.07.2017, but executed wholly or partly after
introduction of GST, was required to be determined in accordance with the
Government of Odisha’s revised guidelines dated 10.12.2018.
- Whether the competent authority was required to recalculate the
GST-inclusive value of balance work under the revised Schedule of Rates
and reimburse the contractor where the revised GST-inclusive value
exceeded the original agreement value.
- Whether the Petitioner’s grievance should be considered through a
comprehensive representation before the appropriate authority.
Petitioner’s
Arguments
The Petitioner contended that the introduction of
GST created an additional tax burden that was not envisaged at the time of
entering into the works contract agreement.
It was argued that the Opposite Parties had failed
to reimburse the differential tax amount arising because of the transition from
VAT to GST with effect from 01.07.2017.
The Petitioner further submitted that the present
writ petition was identical to W.P.(C) No. 5933 of 2020 and should therefore be
disposed of in terms of the order dated 18.02.2020 passed in that case.
The underlying grievance was that contractors
executing pre-GST works contracts after 01.07.2017 should receive appropriate
adjustment of the tax impact in accordance with the revised Government
guidelines.
Respondent’s
Arguments
The learned Additional Standing Counsel appearing
for the State-Opposite Parties did not dispute the Petitioner’s submission that
the matter was identical to W.P.(C) No. 5933 of 2020.
The State’s position also brought on record the
revised guidelines relating to works contracts under GST issued by the
Government of Odisha, Finance Department through Office Memorandum dated
10.12.2018.
These revised guidelines prescribed the mechanism
for determining the amount payable to works contractors where tenders had been
invited before 01.07.2017 on the basis of SoR-2014 but payment for full or
balance work was made after implementation of GST.
Court Order
/ Findings
The Orissa High Court directed the Petitioner to
make a comprehensive representation before the appropriate authority within
two weeks from the date of the order, setting out the grievance regarding
differential tax reimbursement.
The Court further directed that, if such
representation was filed, the competent authority should consider and
dispose of it in light of the revised guidelines dated 10.12.2018 issued by the
Finance Department, Government of Odisha, as expeditiously as possible and
preferably by 02.01.2023.
The Court expressly clarified that if the
Petitioner remained aggrieved by the decision of the authority, it would be
open to the Petitioner to challenge that decision.
Accordingly, the writ petition was disposed of.
Important
Clarification
The judgment is significant because it does not
record an automatic or unconditional grant of GST differential reimbursement
to the Petitioner. Instead, it requires the Petitioner to submit a
comprehensive representation and mandates consideration of that representation
under the revised Government of Odisha guidelines dated 10.12.2018.
The revised guidelines, reproduced in detail in the
order, clarify the treatment of pre-GST works contracts executed wholly or
partly after 01.07.2017:
- GST came into force from 01.07.2017 by subsuming indirect taxes
including Excise Duty, VAT, CST, Entry Tax and Service Tax.
- Works contracts are treated as composite supply of service under
GST and may be taxable at 18%, 12% or 5%, depending on the nature of the
works contract.
- For tenders invited before 01.07.2017 on the basis of SoR-2014, but
where payments for balance or full work were made after GST
implementation, the balance work value must be determined under the
prescribed revised methodology.
- The item-wise quantity of work done after 30.06.2017 must first be
ascertained.
- The revised estimated value of balance work must be determined
under Revised SoR-2014.
- Where goods or services are not covered by Revised SoR-2014, the
tax-exclusive basic value must be determined by removing embedded
incidences of VAT, Entry Tax, Excise Duty, Service Tax and similar taxes.
- The revised estimated work value must be adjusted in the same
proportion as the tender premium or discount.
- Applicable GST at 5%, 12% or 18%, as the case may be, must then be
added to determine the GST-inclusive value of the balance work.
- Where the revised GST-inclusive value exceeds the original
agreement value for the balance work, the contractor is to be reimbursed
for the excess amount.
- Where the revised GST-inclusive value is lower than the original
agreement value, payment must be reduced accordingly, and any excess
payment already made must be recovered.
- The procedure applies to all works contracts, including EPC,
Turn-key and Lumpsum contracts.
- For F2 contracts, the taxable value under GST for each item of
balance work is to be determined by the competent authority by applying
the premium or discount offered by the contractor to the respective item.
Thus, the Court’s direction ensures administrative
examination of the contractor’s claim under the specific revised mechanism
rather than granting reimbursement merely on assertion of an increased GST
burden.
Sections /
Legal Provisions and Government Guidelines Involved
1. Article 226 of the Constitution of India
The writ petition was instituted before the High Court in its writ jurisdiction
for redress against the alleged non-reimbursement of differential tax arising
from the transition to GST.
2. Goods and Services Tax Regime effective from
01.07.2017
The dispute directly concerns the transition from the earlier indirect tax
regime to GST and its impact upon ongoing works contracts.
3. Works Contract under GST
As recorded in the revised guidelines reproduced by the Court, works contract
is treated as a composite supply of service under GST, with applicable rates
stated as 18%, 12% or 5%, depending upon the nature of the works contract.
4. Government of Odisha, Finance Department Office
Memorandum No. FIN-CTITAX-0045-2017/38535/F dated 10.12.2018
This is the principal revised guideline governing recalculation and adjustment
of GST impact upon specified works contracts.
5. Finance Department Letter No.
FINCTI-TAX-0045-2017-36116/F dated 07.12.2017
The earlier guidelines were superseded by the revised guidelines dated
10.12.2018.
6. Revised Schedule of Rates-2014 (Revised
SoR-2014)
The revised methodology requires determination of the balance work value under
Revised SoR-2014 and addition of applicable GST thereafter.
7. Works Department O.M. No. 13827/WD dated
16.09.2017, effective from 01.07.2017
The order records that the State Government revised SoR-2014 in connection with
GST compliance for works contracts.
Link to download the order -https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1783313792_999compressed.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes
only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable
sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory
guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from
the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of
AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment