Facts of the Case
The Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise,
Jammu and Kashmir, Jammu filed the appeal before the High Court under Section
35G of the Central Excise Act, 1994, challenging an order passed by the
Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh (CESTAT).
The dispute formed part of a batch of similar
matters in which CESTAT had set aside the orders passed by the Commissioner
(Appeals) and the Adjudicating Authority and had directed refund of Education
Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess to the assessee. The
Tribunal’s approach was based on the decision of the Supreme Court in M/s
SRD Nutrients Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Guwahati,
reported as 2017 (335) ELT 481 (SC).
The High Court recorded that the earlier batch of
appeals filed by the Revenue, together with applications seeking condonation of
delay and with CEA No. 10/2022 as the lead case, had already been
dismissed by a Coordinate Bench through judgment dated 23 May 2022.
Issues
Involved
The principal issues arising in the matter were:
- Whether the Revenue’s appeal under Section 35G of the Central
Excise Act, 1994 against the CESTAT order concerning refund of
Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess warranted separate
consideration.
- Whether the present appeal was materially distinguishable from the
earlier batch of appeals already decided by the Coordinate Bench on 23 May
2022.
- Whether, in view of almost identical grounds and an already
concluded precedent involving similar orders, the High Court should
maintain parity and dismiss the present appeal on the same terms and
conditions.
Appellant’s
Arguments
The appellant, the Commissioner of Central GST and
Central Excise J&K, Jammu, challenged the CESTAT order under Section 35G
of the Central Excise Act, 1994.
From the judgment, the Revenue’s challenge
concerned a CESTAT order similar to those involved in the earlier batch of
appeals. Those Tribunal orders had set aside the decisions of the Commissioner
(Appeals) and the Adjudicating Authority and had directed refund of Education
Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess to the assessee in view of the
Supreme Court decision in M/s SRD Nutrients Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of
Central Excise, Guwahati.
The High Court specifically noted that the instant
appeal raised almost identical grounds to those already dealt with by
the Coordinate Bench in its judgment dated 23 May 2022. The short order does
not separately reproduce any further detailed submissions of the appellant
beyond the nature of the challenge recorded by the Court.
Respondent’s
Arguments
The respondent was M/s Berger Paints India
Limited, Unit-II, SIDCO, IGC, Samba, J&K.
The judgment records that none appeared for the
respondent. Therefore, no separate oral arguments or detailed respondent
submissions are recorded in the order. The Court decided the appeal after
examining its contents and comparing the challenge with the earlier batch of
appeals already adjudicated by the Coordinate Bench.
Court Order
/ Findings
The High Court examined the contents of the instant
appeal and found that:
- the appeal challenged a similar order to those involved in the
earlier batch of appeals;
- the challenge was based on almost identical grounds;
- those grounds had already been dealt with by the Coordinate Bench
while passing the judgment dated 23 May 2022; and
- parity therefore required the present appeal to receive the same
treatment.
Accordingly, the High Court dismissed the appeal
on the same terms and conditions as laid down in the Coordinate Bench judgment
dated 23 May 2022.
The Court further ordered that any interim
direction(s) subsisting as on the date of judgment would stand vacated. The
operative conclusion appears on page 2 of the uploaded order.
Important
Clarification
This judgment is significant for its application of
judicial parity and consistency. The High Court did not undertake a
fresh, detailed adjudication of the underlying refund controversy because it
found that the present appeal challenged a similar order on almost identical
grounds that had already been considered and decided by a Coordinate Bench.
A further important clarification is that the
present two-page judgment itself does not independently set out an elaborate
fresh ruling on every substantive aspect of refund entitlement. Instead, it
dismisses the appeal by expressly following the earlier Coordinate Bench
judgment dated 23 May 2022. Therefore, the precise operative scope of the
dismissal must be understood together with the terms and conditions laid down
in that earlier judgment.
It is also material that the Supreme Court decision
in M/s SRD Nutrients Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Central Excise,
Guwahati, 2017 (335) ELT 481 (SC) is mentioned in the judgment as the
authority in view of which CESTAT had directed refund of Education Cess and
Secondary & Higher Education Cess. The High Court’s present order records
that background and dismisses the Revenue appeal on parity with the earlier
batch.
Sections
Involved
Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1994 — The provision under which the Commissioner of Central GST and Central
Excise filed the appeal before the High Court against the CESTAT order.
Subject Matter: Refund of Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess, CESTAT refund direction, challenge by Revenue, application of earlier Coordinate Bench decision, and dismissal of appeal to maintain parity.
Link to Download the Order-https://mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1783403919_1347compressed.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment