Facts of the Case
M/s. Capital Enterprisers filed W.P.(C) No. 34629
of 2020 before the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack seeking reliefs in relation
to the transitional credit mechanism under GST.
During the hearing, learned counsel for the
Petitioner stated that, pursuant to the order dated 22 July 2022 passed by the
Supreme Court in SLP(C) Nos. 32709-32710/2018, Union of India v. Filco Trade
Centre Pvt. Ltd., the Principal Commissioner GST had issued Circular No.
180/12/2022-GST dated 9 September 2022 prescribing guidelines for
filing/revising TRAN-1/TRAN-2.
The Petitioner further stated that it would avail
itself of the facility made available pursuant to the above Supreme Court order
and the said Circular. Accordingly, the Petitioner did not press the reliefs
prayed for in the writ petition at that stage.
Issues Involved
The principal issue arising from the order was
whether the Petitioner’s writ petition required further adjudication when:
- The Supreme Court had already passed an order dated 22 July 2022 in
Union of India v. Filco Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd., facilitating the
filing/revision of TRAN-1/TRAN-2; and
- Circular No. 180/12/2022-GST dated 9 September 2022 had
subsequently prescribed guidelines for filing/revising TRAN-1/TRAN-2; and
- The Petitioner expressed its intention to avail itself of the said
facility and, therefore, did not press the writ reliefs at that stage.
Petitioner’s
Arguments
The Petitioner, through learned counsel, submitted
that:
- The Supreme Court, by its order dated 22 July 2022 in SLP(C) Nos.
32709-32710/2018, Union of India v. Filco Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd., had
provided relief concerning the filing/revision of TRAN-1/TRAN-2.
- Pursuant to the Supreme Court’s order, the Principal Commissioner
GST issued Circular No. 180/12/2022-GST dated 9 September 2022 prescribing
guidelines for filing/revising TRAN-1/TRAN-2.
- The Petitioner intended to avail itself of the facility made
available under the above framework.
- In view of the availability of such facility, the Petitioner was
not pressing the reliefs prayed for in the writ petition at that stage.
Respondent’s
Arguments
The order records “None” for the Opposite
Parties and does not set out any substantive arguments or submissions on behalf
of the Respondents/Opposite Parties.
Accordingly, no independent respondent-side
contention should be attributed beyond what is expressly recorded in the
judicial order.
Court Order
/ Findings
The High Court of Orissa took note of the statement
made by learned counsel for the Petitioner that:
- the Supreme Court had passed the relevant order dated 22 July 2022
in Union of India v. Filco Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd.;
- Circular No. 180/12/2022-GST dated 9 September 2022 had prescribed
guidelines for filing/revising TRAN-1/TRAN-2;
- the Petitioner would avail itself of the above facility; and
- the Petitioner was consequently not pressing the reliefs sought in
the writ petition at that stage.
Accordingly, the High Court disposed of the writ
petition as not pressed.
Important
Clarification
The High Court did not adjudicate the underlying
transitional credit dispute on merits in this order.
The writ petition was disposed of because the
Petitioner stated that it intended to avail itself of the facility arising from
the Supreme Court’s order in Union of India v. Filco Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd. and
the guidelines prescribed through Circular No. 180/12/2022-GST dated 9
September 2022.
Therefore, the order should not be read as an
independent determination by the High Court on the substantive eligibility,
quantum, or final admissibility of transitional credit claimed by the
Petitioner.
It is also important that the operative disposal
was “as not pressed” and not a merits-based allowance or dismissal of
the Petitioner’s underlying transitional credit claim.
Sections /
Provisions Involved
Primary statutory context:
- Section 140 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 — Transitional arrangements for input tax credit.
Procedural framework generally associated with the
subject matter:
- Rule 117 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 — Procedural framework concerning declaration of transitional
credit.
- FORM GST TRAN-1 — Transitional credit
declaration.
- FORM GST TRAN-2 — Transitional credit
declaration applicable in specified circumstances.
- Circular No. 180/12/2022-GST dated 09.09.2022 — Guidelines for filing/revising TRAN-1/TRAN-2 pursuant to the
Supreme Court’s directions.
Important accuracy note: The short High Court order expressly refers to TRAN-1/TRAN-2, the
Supreme Court order in Filco Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd., and Circular No.
180/12/2022-GST. It does not expressly reproduce or adjudicate the text of
Section 140 or Rule 117. These provisions are stated as the relevant statutory
and procedural context of the transitional credit matter.
Legal
Significance of the Decision
The decision demonstrates the practical effect of
the Supreme Court’s directions in the Filco Trade Centre matter on pending writ
petitions concerning TRAN-1/TRAN-2 transitional credit issues.
Where a petitioner considered the portal-based
filing/revision facility sufficient to pursue its transitional credit claim,
continuation of the writ proceedings could become unnecessary at that stage. In
the present case, this resulted in disposal of the writ petition as not
pressed.
The order is therefore significant for
understanding the procedural impact of the Filco Trade Centre directions and
Circular No. 180/12/2022-GST on pending GST transitional credit litigation.
Conclusion
In M/s. Capital Enterprisers vs Union of India
& Others, the High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition as not
pressed after the Petitioner stated that it would avail itself of the facility
for filing/revising TRAN-1/TRAN-2 made available pursuant to the Supreme
Court’s order dated 22 July 2022 in Union of India v. Filco Trade Centre Pvt.
Ltd. and the guidelines contained in Circular No. 180/12/2022-GST dated 9
September 2022.
The High Court did not decide the underlying
transitional credit dispute on merits.
Link to download the order -
https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1783323227_1218compressed.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment