Facts of the Case
The petitioner, M/s. Merco Engineers Private
Limited, challenged the legality and validity of the Order-in-Original
dated 08.03.2022, whereby the Additional Commissioner confirmed a Service
Tax demand of ₹1,22,73,120, along with applicable interest and penalty
under Section 73(2) of the Finance Act, 1994 read with Section 174 of the CGST
Act, 2017.
The petitioner contended that neither the show
cause notice preceding the Order-in-Original nor the notices for personal
hearing were ever served upon it. Consequently, the petitioner was denied an
opportunity to submit its defence before the adjudicating authority passed the
order.
Issues Involved
- Whether the Order-in-Original passed without proper service of the
show cause notice and hearing notices is legally sustainable.
- Whether denial of an opportunity of hearing amounts to violation of
the principles of natural justice.
- Whether the adjudication order deserves to be quashed where the
department is unable to establish service of notices upon the assessee.
Petitioner's Arguments
- The petitioner submitted that the adjudication proceedings were
conducted without serving the show cause notice.
- It was further argued that no notice fixing personal hearing was
ever received.
- Since no opportunity was granted to contest the allegations, the
Order-in-Original was passed in complete violation of the principles of
natural justice.
- The petitioner sought quashing of the impugned order and requested
an opportunity to submit its reply before the adjudicating authority.
Respondent's Arguments
The Department submitted before the High Court that
although the office had issued the show cause notice and personal hearing
notices, there was no record available to establish that the notices had
actually been served upon the petitioner.
Court Order / Findings
The Telangana High Court observed that the
respondent was unable to produce any record demonstrating service of the show
cause notice or hearing notices upon the petitioner.
Considering the absence of proof regarding service
of notice, the Court held that the petitioner had been deprived of an effective
opportunity of hearing.
Accordingly, the Court held that the ends of
justice would be met by granting the petitioner an opportunity to participate
in the adjudication proceedings.
The Court therefore:
- Set aside and quashed the Order-in-Original dated 08.03.2022.
- Directed that the impugned Order-in-Original shall be treated as
the show cause notice.
- Granted fifteen days to the petitioner to file its reply.
- Directed the adjudicating authority to pass a fresh order in
accordance with law after granting due opportunity of hearing.
- Disposed of the writ petition without costs.
Important Clarification
This judgment reiterates that:
- Mere issuance of a show cause notice is insufficient unless the
department is able to establish its proper service upon the taxpayer.
- Absence of proof of service constitutes violation of the principles
of natural justice.
- Any adjudication order passed without providing an effective opportunity
of hearing is liable to be quashed.
- The Court may direct that the impugned adjudication order itself be
treated as the show cause notice, thereby enabling fresh adjudication
after giving adequate opportunity to the assessee.
Sections Involved
- Section 73(2) of the Finance Act, 1994
- Section 174 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
- Article 226 of the Constitution of India
- Principles of Natural Justice
Link to download the order-https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1783931627_191compressed.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment