Facts of the Case
The present matter consisted of seven connected
regular bail petitions arising from FIR No. 8 dated 21.08.2020,
registered by the Vigilance Bureau, Phase-I, SAS Nagar, Mohali. The FIR alleged
a large-scale Goods and Services Tax (GST) evasion racket operating in the
State of Punjab.
According to the prosecution, intelligence inputs
indicated that officials of the GST Department, traders, transporters and
intermediaries were involved in a conspiracy whereby monthly bribes were
allegedly paid to public officials. It was alleged that inter-State and
intra-State transactions were conducted without proper accounting or payment of
GST, resulting in wrongful availment of bogus Input Tax Credit (ITC). The
investigation was initiated after lawful interception of mobile phones of
certain accused persons.
The petitioners were arrested during August and
September 2022 and sought regular bail before the High Court.
Issues Involved
- Whether the petitioners were entitled to regular bail after
completion of investigation.
- Whether continued judicial custody was justified when the
charge-sheet had already been filed.
- Whether the delay in trial due to pending prosecution sanction
against GST officials justified grant of bail.
- Whether parity with co-accused who had already been granted bail
should be extended to the petitioners.
Petitioners' Arguments
The petitioners submitted that:
- They had remained in custody for a considerable period.
- Investigation against them had already been completed.
- The challan had been presented before the competent court.
- Their names surfaced primarily during interrogation of co-accused.
- Trial was unlikely to conclude within a reasonable time because
prosecution sanction against the departmental officials had not yet been
granted.
- Similarly placed co-accused had already been granted regular bail
by the High Court and the principle of parity entitled the petitioners to
similar relief.
Respondent's Arguments
The State opposed the grant of bail.
However, the State fairly acknowledged that:
- Investigation against the petitioners had been completed.
- The charge-sheet had already been filed.
- Sanction for prosecution of the concerned departmental officials
was still awaited.
Court Order / Findings
The Punjab & Haryana High Court granted regular
bail to all the petitioners.
The Court observed that:
- Investigation against the petitioners stood completed.
- The challan had already been filed.
- Co-accused had previously been granted bail.
- The trial was likely to take considerable time since prosecution
sanction against departmental officials was still pending.
Considering these circumstances, and without
expressing any opinion on the merits of the allegations, the Court held that
the petitioners deserved the concession of regular bail subject to furnishing
appropriate bail bonds before the concerned Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty
Magistrate.
Important Clarification
The High Court specifically clarified that:
- The observations contained in the bail order shall not be treated
as an expression on the merits of the prosecution case.
- The order is confined only to consideration of the bail
applications.
- All pending miscellaneous applications were disposed of as
infructuous upon disposal of the main petitions.
Sections
Involved
Prevention
of Corruption Act, 1988
- Section 7
- Section 7A
- Section 8
Indian Penal
Code, 1860
- Section 420
- Section 465
- Section 467
- Section 468
- Section 471
- Section 201
- Section 120-B
Link to Download the Order-https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1783931783_192compressed.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment