Facts of the Case
The petitioner, M/s Nippon Engineering
Corporation, Faridabad, filed the present writ petition before the Punjab
& Haryana High Court seeking relief regarding the filing of TRAN-1/TRAN-2
forms for claiming Transitional Input Tax Credit (ITC) under the GST regime.
During the hearing, the respondents brought to the
notice of the Court the order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Union
of India & Another vs Filco Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd. & Another (SLP (C)
Nos. 32709-32710 of 2018 dated 22.07.2022), whereby the Supreme Court
directed the reopening of the GST portal for all eligible taxpayers to file or
revise TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 forms.
The respondents assured the Court that the
directions of the Supreme Court would be complied with. In view of the said
development, the petitioner chose not to press the writ petition.
Issues Involved
- Whether the petitioner was entitled to relief for filing or
revising TRAN-1/TRAN-2 forms for claiming Transitional Input Tax Credit?
- Whether the Supreme Court's directions in Union of India vs
Filco Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd. resolved the grievance raised in the writ
petition?
- Whether further adjudication by the High Court was required after
reopening of the GST portal?
Petitioner's Arguments
- The petitioner sought an opportunity to file or revise
TRAN-1/TRAN-2 forms to claim eligible Transitional Input Tax Credit.
- The petitioner submitted that denial of such opportunity adversely
affected its legitimate GST credit.
- After being informed of the Supreme Court's directions reopening
the GST portal, the petitioner did not press the writ petition as the
grievance stood substantially addressed.
Respondents' Arguments
- The respondents relied upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme
Court in Union of India & Another vs Filco Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd.
& Another.
- It was submitted that:
- GSTN would reopen the common portal.
- Eligible taxpayers could file or revise TRAN-1/TRAN-2 forms.
- Technical glitches would be addressed.
- Authorities would verify claims and pass orders on merits.
- The respondents assured complete compliance with the Supreme
Court's directions.
Court Order / Findings
The Punjab & Haryana High Court observed that
the controversy involved in the writ petition had already been addressed by the
directions issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Union of India &
Another vs Filco Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd. & Another.
Since the respondents undertook to comply with the
Supreme Court's order and the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the
petition, the Court disposed of the writ petition as not pressed.
The Court also ordered that all pending
applications stood disposed of.
Important Clarification
The judgment reiterates that:
- GSTN was directed by the Supreme Court to reopen the common portal
for filing or revising TRAN-1 and TRAN-2.
- All eligible taxpayers could avail the benefit irrespective of
whether:
- they had filed a writ petition,
- their case had been decided by the IT Grievance Redressal
Committee (ITGRC), or
- they had earlier faced technical glitches.
- Verification of Transitional Credit claims was to be undertaken by
the proper officers after granting reasonable opportunity of hearing.
- This High Court order merely records compliance with the binding
directions of the Supreme Court and disposes of the petition accordingly.
Sections Involved
- Section 140 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST
Act)
- Rule 117 of the CGST Rules, 2017
- Transitional Input Tax Credit (TRAN-1 & TRAN-2)
- Article 226 of the Constitution of India
Link to download the order - https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1783921730_2120compressed.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general information and knowledge purposes
only. Readers should independently verify the information from reliable
sources. It is not intended to provide legal, professional, or advisory
guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim all liability arising from
the use of this content. The material has been prepared with the assistance of
AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment