Facts of the Case
Tomco Engineering (P) Ltd., a contractor, was
awarded certain works by the Kerala Water Authority. At the time the tender was
floated and the work order was issued, the applicable indirect tax considered
in the contract was Value Added Tax (VAT) at 5% under the Kerala Value
Added Tax Act. Service Tax was fully exempt since the work was executed for a
Government entity.
After the implementation of the Goods and Services
Tax (GST) regime with effect from 01.07.2017, the exemption was
withdrawn, and GST became payable at 12% on the execution of the
contract. The petitioner contended that the Kerala Water Authority had itself
issued Ext.P2 Circular providing for reimbursement of GST in such
circumstances. However, despite the circular, the petitioner's claim for reimbursement
was not considered, compelling the filing of the writ petition.
Issues Involved
- Whether the contractor was entitled to reimbursement of GST payable
after the introduction of GST where the original tender had considered
only VAT.
- Whether the Kerala Water Authority was required to consider the
reimbursement claim in accordance with its own GST Circular (Ext.P2).
Petitioner’s Arguments
- The tender conditions and contract value were based only on VAT
at 5%, as applicable under the pre-GST regime.
- Service Tax was exempt because the work related to a Government
entity.
- After the implementation of GST, the petitioner became liable to
pay GST at 12%, resulting in an additional tax burden.
- The Kerala Water Authority had issued Ext.P2 Circular, which
specifically contemplated reimbursement of GST in such situations.
- Despite the circular, the respondents failed to process or decide
the reimbursement claim, making judicial intervention necessary.
Respondent’s Arguments
The Kerala Water Authority submitted that it had no
objection to considering the petitioner's claim for GST reimbursement in
accordance with Ext.P2 Circular. The Authority requested that an
appropriate direction be issued permitting consideration of the claim under the
said circular.
Court Order / Findings
The Kerala High Court observed that, in view of the
stand taken by the Kerala Water Authority, the petitioner's claim deserved
consideration under Ext.P2 Circular.
Accordingly, the Court directed the Kerala Water
Authority to:
- Consider the petitioner's claim for reimbursement of GST strictly
in accordance with Ext.P2 Circular.
- Provide the petitioner with an opportunity of being heard before
taking a decision.
- Pass appropriate orders within two months from the date of
receipt of a certified copy of the judgment.
The writ petition was disposed of with the above
directions.
Important Clarification
- Introduction of GST after execution of a Government contract may
give rise to a legitimate claim for reimbursement where the original
contract price was based on the pre-GST tax structure.
- Government departments and public authorities must consider
reimbursement claims in accordance with their applicable circulars or
policy decisions.
- The judgment does not automatically grant reimbursement but
mandates fair consideration of the claim after providing an opportunity of
hearing.
- Administrative authorities are expected to decide such claims
within the time prescribed by the Court.
Sections /
Legal Provisions Involved
- Goods and Services Tax (GST) Act, 2017
- Kerala Water Authority GST Circular (Ext.P2)
- Article 226 of the Constitution of India
- Principles relating to reimbursement of GST on Government contracts
executed after implementation of GST
Link to
download the order -
https://www.mytaxexpert.co.in/uploads/1784625969_1634compressed.pdf
Disclaimer
This content is shared strictly for general
information and knowledge purposes only. Readers should independently verify
the information from reliable sources. It is not intended to provide legal,
professional, or advisory guidance. The author and the organisation disclaim
all liability arising from the use of this content. The material has been
prepared with the assistance of AI tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Comment